Reflective practice has gained traction in clinical psychology largely to address the fact that practitioners must frequently “use their heads” when scientific data are not readily available. Despite their widespread adoption, reflective practice techniques are largely lacking in supportive outcome evidence. We contend that the reflective practice literature has remained largely disconnected from basic psychological science, especially work on the limitations of (a) introspection as a means of becoming aware of one's biases, (b) self-assessment, and (c) acquiring expertise from experience. To realize its potential, the reflective practice literature will need to forge closer connections with work on social cognition and debiasing, and to determine whether its techniques enhance patient outcomes and the validity of clinicians’ judgments and predictions.

中文翻译：

---

临床心理学的反思性实践：来自基础心理科学的反思

反思性实践在临床心理学中获得了广泛关注，主要是为了解决这样一个事实，即当科学数据不易获得时，从业者必须经常“动脑筋”。尽管它们被广泛采用，但反思性实践技术在很大程度上缺乏支持性的结果证据。我们认为，反思性实践文献在很大程度上与基础心理学科学脱节，尤其是在以下方面的工作：（a）内省作为一种意识到自己的偏见的手段，（b）自我评估，以及（c）从经验。为了发挥其潜力，反思性实践文献将需要与社会认知和去偏见工作建立更紧密的联系，