当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. J. Med. Genet. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing on Australian clinical genetics services.
European Journal of Medical Genetics ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-02 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.103968
Michael Millward 1 , Jane Tiller 2 , Michael Bogwitz 3 , Helen Kincaid 4 , Shelby Taylor 3 , Alison H Trainer 3 , Paul Lacaze 2
Affiliation  

The increasing popularity of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) is thought to be creating a burden on clinical genetic services worldwide. However, no Australian studies have collected recent evidence regarding this impact. We surveyed Australian clinical genetics services about DTCGT-related referrals over the past 10 years. Eleven publicly-funded services reported over 100 DTCGT-related referrals. Most (83%) involved general practitioners seeking interpretation of DTCGT results. More than 30% involved imputed risk estimates from third-party software tools. Services reported low validation rates for DTCGT results (<10%), and variable procedures for managing DTCGT referrals, with most (8/11) lacking specific procedures. Our study helps quantify the impact of DTCGT on clinical genetics services, and highlights the impact of imputed risk estimates.



中文翻译:

直接面向消费者的基因检测对澳大利亚临床遗传学服务的影响。

直接面向消费者的基因检测(DTCGT)日益普及,这正在给全球临床基因服务造成负担。但是,没有澳大利亚的研究收集到有关这种影响的最新证据。我们调查了过去10年中有关DTCGT相关转诊的澳大利亚临床遗传学服务。11个由政府资助的服务报告了超过100个与DTCGT相关的推荐。大部分(83%)的全科医生寻求DTCGT结果的解释。超过30%的涉及来自第三方软件工具的估算风险估算。服务部门报告的DTCGT结果验证率很低(<10%),并且管理DTCGT推荐人的程序可变,其中大多数(8/11)缺少特定程序。我们的研究有助于量化DTCGT对临床遗传学服务的影响,

更新日期:2020-06-02
down
wechat
bug