当前位置: X-MOL 学术Am. J. Law Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Queering America's Heteronormative Family Law through "Well-Conceived" Legislation (Or, Genetic Parents Exist and Sometimes Your Kid Might Want to Know Them).
American Journal of Law & Medicine ( IF 0.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-01 , DOI: 10.1177/0098858820919554
Suzanne Davies 1
Affiliation  

In recent years, the American legal system has increasingly recognized LGBT and queer parents, granting them enforceable parental rights and responsibilities towards their children. This includes increased legal recognition of queer parents who are not biologically related to their children. But despite great strides forward in LGBT civil rights law, not all queer parents are created equal. Queer parents who are not married to their partners, parents in couples where neither partner physically gave birth to their children, and polyamorous parents who choose to raise children with two or more other people, all face greater difficulties in establishing legal parenthood—and their legal rights vary widely from state to state. At the same time, the rights of queer parents sometimes come into conflict with the rights of their children—particularly in families formed via assisted reproductive technology (“ART”). Queer parents and their children have been crucial to the success of the LGBT civil rights movement. Many of the foundational Supreme Court cases that articulate constitutional rights for same-sex couples make reference to the children of such couples reflecting an increased social awareness that queer parents have already existed for a long time, perhaps living side-by-side with straight families and sending their children to the same schools. Indeed, in both Windsor and Obergefell, Justice Anthony Kennedy explicitly expressed concern for these children and reasoned that gay marriage would help protect the children of same-sex couples from feeling that

中文翻译:

通过“周全”的立法来质疑美国的非常规家庭法(或者存在遗传父母,有时您的孩子可能想知道他们)。

近年来,美国法律体系越来越认可LGBT和酷儿父母,赋予他们对子女的可执行的父母权利和责任。这包括对与孩子没有生物学关系的酷儿父母的法律认可度有所提高。但是,尽管LGBT民权法取得了长足进步,但并非所有同性恋父母都是平等的。未与伴侣结婚的酷儿父母,没有伴侣实际生育子女的夫妻父母,以及选择与两个或更多其他人抚养子女的多婚父母,在建立合法父母身份和合法父母方面都面临着更大的困难。权利因州而异。与此同时,酷儿父母的权利有时会与其子女的权利发生冲突,特别是在通过辅助生殖技术(“ ART”)组成的家庭中。酷儿的父母及其子女对于LGBT民权运动的成功至关重要。最高法院的许多基本案件都阐明了同性伴侣的宪法权利,其中提到了此类夫妇的子女,这反映出社会意识的增强,即酷儿父母已经存在很长时间了,也许与直系家庭并肩生活并将他们的孩子送到同一所学校。的确,在温莎(Windsor)和奥贝斐尔(Obergefell)中,法官安东尼·肯尼迪(Anthony Kennedy)明确表达了对这些孩子的关注,并认为同性婚姻将有助于保护同性夫妇的孩子免于
更新日期:2020-03-01
down
wechat
bug