当前位置: X-MOL 学术Explore › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Are paradoxes of amoeboid cognition, memristors, and memory mandating a re-conceptualization of actions and behaviors?
Explore ( IF 1.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-29 , DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.04.001
Siguna Mueller 1
Affiliation  

Background From intelligent behaviors of individual molecules and primitive organisms to those with a nervous system and brain, nature displays a fascinating collective memory across time and space. Using certain electronic circuits called memristors, it has been possible to emulate several processes of memory and learning, including a predictive form of intelligence of simple amoebas.

Purpose What is the core of such intelligent performances? Although memristors are able to effectively describe puzzling biologic behaviors, recent results challenge their very existence altogether. This paper asks what can be gleaned from the underlying controversy itself, which will be argued is analogous to the observer principle in quantum physics. It is hypothesized that the material phenomena of resonance and sync have a counterpart involving behavior and memory. This questions the prominent role of a causative agent, and which type of behavior or memory is being occasioned.

Results Building on the theory of memristors, the challenge of their actualization, and puzzling behaviors of amoebas, this paper proposes that ‘resonating actions’ - that is, similar or interlinked behaviors beyond space and time - are enabled by an underlying field of potentiation or domain of influence, and not by a cause-effect relationship. Such linked behaviors resemble a form of ‘action coherence.’ Habituated actions, memory, and behavior may arise out of a similar field of consciousness (here, modeled as memristors). These principles may be at the core of many hitherto unexplained mysteries of collective learning and behavior beyond space and time. Although this study is based on amoebas, the key postulates are also of great relevance to human thinking, behavior, and performance (including the representation of illness), and have independently been confirmed in the fields of consciousness research and spirituality.



中文翻译:

变形虫认知,忆阻器和记忆悖论是否要求对行为和行为进行重新概念化?

背景技术从单个分子和原始生物体的智能行为到具有神经系统和大脑的分子,大自然在时间和空间上展现出令人着迷的集体记忆。使用某些称为忆阻器的电子电路,可以模拟记忆和学习的多个过程,包括简单变形虫的智能预测形式。

目的这种智能表演的核心是什么?尽管忆阻器能够有效地描述令人费解的生物学行为,但最近的研究结果完全挑战了它们的存在。本文提出了从潜在的争议本身中可以得到什么,这将被认为类似于量子物理学中的观察者原理。假设共振和同步的物质现象与行为和记忆有关。这质疑了致病因素的突出作用,以及正在发生哪种类型的行为或记忆。

结果基于忆阻器的理论,其实现的挑战以及变形虫的令人困惑的行为,本文提出,“共振作用”(即,超越时空的相似或相互关联的行为)由潜在的增强作用域或领域实现影响力,而不是因果关系。这种关联的行为类似于“动作连贯性”的形式。习惯性的动作,记忆和行为可能来自相似的意识领域(在此被建模为忆阻器)。这些原则可能是迄今为止许多超越时空的集体学习和行为之谜的核心。尽管这项研究基于变形虫,但关键的假设也与人类的思维,行为和表现(包括疾病的表现)有着密切的关系,

更新日期:2020-05-29
down
wechat
bug