BACKGROUND One of the main roles of the medical information (MI) department within a pharmaceutical company is to develop scientific/standard response documents (SRDs) to provide comprehensive medical information to healthcare providers (HCPs). This study seeks to gain HCP feedback on the various elements in the format of an SRD. METHODS This study surveyed 400 healthcare providers (200 physicians, 100 pharmacists, and 100 nurse practitioners/advanced practice nurses and physician assistants) regarding their opinions and preferences on the structure, content, layout, and delivery options of SRDs. The survey also included questions assessing where HCPs access their medical information, their trust in the medical information they receive from MI Departments, and alternative methods for receiving medical information. RESULTS HCPs often self-search for medical information via an electronic device, which allows for SRDs to serve as a key resource. HCPs, who had prior contact with a pharmaceutical company's MI department, have a high degree of trust in the SRDs that they had received. However, perception of bias can have an impact on their level of trust. HCPs prefer all relevant data such as real-world evidence, adverse drug reactions, and clinical trial data, while abstracts and data on file may not be needed, but the overall length should only be three to five pages. HCPs find value in various SRD formatting characteristics, such as charts, tables, and infographics. CONCLUSIONS Overall, HCPs seek medical information resources, such as SRDs, to aid in the delivery of personalized patient care. HCPs prefer SRDs to be concise, but include comprehensive, unbiased medical information. Through HCP feedback, MI Departments of pharmaceutical companies can continue to develop and update their SRDs to increase uptake and potentially impact clinical practice.

中文翻译：

---

医疗保健提供者对科学/标准响应文件的意见和趋势

背景技术制药公司内的医疗信息 (MI) 部门的主要职责之一是开发科学/标准响应文件 (SRD) 以向医疗保健提供者 (HCP) 提供全面的医疗信息。本研究旨在获得 HCP 对 SRD 格式中各种元素的反馈。方法 本研究调查了 400 名医疗保健提供者（200 名医生、100 名药剂师和 100 名执业护士/高级执业护士和医师助理），了解他们对 SRD 的结构、内容、布局和交付选项的意见和偏好。调查还包括评估 HCP 在哪里访问他们的医疗信息、他们对从 MI 部门收到的医疗信息的信任以及接收医疗信息的替代方法的问题。结果 HCP 经常通过电子设备自行搜索医疗信息，这使得 SRD 成为关键资源。先前与制药公司的 MI 部门有过接触的 HCP 对他们收到的 SRD 高度信任。然而，对偏见的看法会影响他们的信任水平。HCP 更喜欢所有相关数据，例如真实世界的证据、药物不良反应和临床试验数据，虽然可能不需要摘要和存档数据，但总长度应该只有三到五页。HCP 在各种 SRD 格式特征中找到价值，例如图表、表格和信息图表。结论 总体而言，HCP 寻求医疗信息资源，例如 SRD，以帮助提供个性化的患者护理。HCP 更喜欢 SRD 简洁，但包括全面的、公正的医疗信息。通过 HCP 反馈，制药公司的 MI 部门可以继续开发和更新他们的 SRD，以提高吸收率并可能影响临床实践。