Around 15% of patients at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR‐P) experience symptomatic remission and functional recovery at follow‐up, yet the definition of a good outcome (GO) in this population requires further development. Outcomes are typically designed and rated by clinicians rather than patients, to measure adverse as opposed to GOs. Here we investigate how CHR‐P subjects define a GO, with the aim of developing a checklist that could be used to measure GO in this clinical group.

中文翻译：

---

检查服务用户的观点，以便为临床精神病高危人群制定良好的结果清单

大约 15% 的临床精神病高危 (CHR-P) 患者在随访时症状缓解和功能恢复，但该人群中良好结局 (GO) 的定义需要进一步发展。结果通常由临床医生而不是患者设计和评级，以衡量与 GO 不同的不良情况。在这里，我们调查 CHR-P 受试者如何定义 GO，目的是开发可用于测量该临床组中 GO 的清单。