当前位置: X-MOL 学术History of Psychiatry › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Freud and Albert Moll: how kindred spirits became bitter foes
History of Psychiatry ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-23 , DOI: 10.1177/0957154x20922130
Harry Oosterhuis 1
Affiliation  

This article explores the antagonism between Sigmund Freud and the German neurologist and sexologist Albert Moll. When Moll, in 1908, published a book about the sexuality of children, Freud, without any grounds, accused him of plagiarism. In fact, Moll had reason to suspect Freud of plagiarism since there are many parallels between Freud’s Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie and Moll’s Untersuchungen über die Libido sexualis. Freud had read this book carefully, but hardly paid tribute to Moll’s innovative thinking about sexuality. A comparison between the two works casts doubt on Freud’s claim that his work was a revolutionary breakthrough. Freud’s course of action raises questions about his integrity. The article also critically addresses earlier evaluations of the clash.

中文翻译:

弗洛伊德和阿尔伯特·摩尔:志同道合的人如何变成仇敌

本文探讨了西格蒙德·弗洛伊德与德国神经学家和性学家阿尔伯特·摩尔之间的对抗。当摩尔在 1908 年出版了一本关于儿童性行为的书时,弗洛伊德毫无根据地指责他抄袭。事实上,摩尔有理由怀疑弗洛伊德抄袭,因为弗洛伊德的 Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie 和摩尔的 Untersuchungen über die Libido Sexuals 之间有很多相似之处。弗洛伊德仔细阅读了这本书,但几乎没有赞扬莫尔关于性的创新思想。两部作品之间的比较令人怀疑弗洛伊德关于他的作品是革命性突破的说法。弗洛伊德的行动方针引发了对其正直性的质疑。这篇文章还批判性地讨论了早期对冲突的评估。
更新日期:2020-05-23
down
wechat
bug