当前位置: X-MOL 学术Acta Physiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Did you know? Fluid-and-electrolyte replacement and the uncertainty principle.
Acta Physiologica ( IF 6.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-23 , DOI: 10.1111/apha.13511
Friedrich C Luft 1
Affiliation  

Surprises are not always welcome. We have studied total body water, quantified the volume and determined the extracellular space, interstitial, and plasma volumes. Nonetheless, estimating these parameters clinically (at the bedside) is frustratingly imprecise. The author ruminates over 50 years’ clinical experience in intensive care units and grapples with the literature.

The critical fluid‐replacement questions are: who needs it?––and if yes, then how much?––very well, what to infuse, and how? These questions have confounded clinicians since they were in a position to intervene in these challenges. Who was first with this clinical conundrum?1 Perhaps O’Shaughnessy was among the first to quantitatively deal with this problem. He analysed the urine and blood of cholera patients and came to the conclusion that oxygen in the blood could reverse the toxic actions.2 O'Shaughnessy found the blood to be deficient in water, salt, and "free alkali" and suggested that injecting intravenously salts would help. He was perhaps the first to introduce reasoned replacement therapies. Whether or not his infusions helped was uncertain, but O'Shaughnessy was sure that volume replacement was the key to mastering this disease. We learn that:

In September, 1831, Asiatic cholera erupted in England. Faced with a mounting death rate and lacking effective therapy, the medical profession grasped at an array of empirical remedies ranging from cayenne pepper given by mouth to turpentine enemas. In response to the need for rational therapy a young physician named William Brooke O'Shaughnessy was persuaded to study the chemical pathology of the blood in cholera. These studies laid the foundations of modern intravenous fluid therapy. The same man was to become a pioneer in the field of telegraphy and, inadvertently, to make a significant contribution to English history.

Our understanding of the vasculature, the idea that the arteries are merely a grandiose extension of the heart (and vice‐versa), the heart's vasomotor control, and the regulation of blood pressure play pivotal roles in volume assessment. For instance, 300 years ago de Sénac wrote; “The arteries (and the heart) have the same movements; they alternate with dilations and contractions without pause.”3 The force inherent in the arteries depends on their muscular fibres and their length. Regulation of the cardiovascular tree concerns us to this date and 300 years of research, until the studies of McGee et al,4 prior to the “molecular” era, brought us to where we are. We are endowed with a reasonable knowledge of the circulatory intrinsic, local, neuronal, and central regulation. These advancements must not be forgotten.3 The >300 years of cardiovascular research include the contributions of Bernard, Brown‐Sequard, Magendie, Bayliss, Gaskell, Langley, Cannon, Dale, Frank, Starling, Hering and others. These brilliant investigators carried physiology on their (not‐yet molecular biology) shoulders, not to mention the clinical relevance of hypotension, hypertension, and central nervous system, cardiovascular, osmolar and renal‐volume, and regulation.



中文翻译:

你知道吗?流体和电解质置换和不确定性原理。

惊喜并不总是受欢迎的。我们研究了全身水分,量化了体积并确定了细胞外空间、间质和血浆体积。尽管如此,临床上(在床边)估计这些参数是非常不精确的。作者回顾了 50 多年在重症监护病房的临床经验,并与文献作斗争。

关键的补液问题是:谁需要它?——如果是,那么需要多少?——很好,输液什么,以及如何输液?这些问题让临床医生感到困惑,因为他们有能力干预这些挑战。谁是第一个遇到这个临床难题的人?1也许 O'Shaughnessy 是第一个定量处理这个问题的人。他分析了霍乱患者的尿液和血液,得出结论,血液中的氧气可以逆转毒性作用。2O'Shaughnessy 发现血液中缺乏水、盐和“游离碱”,并建议静脉注射盐会有所帮助。他可能是第一个引入合理替代疗法的人。他的输液是否有帮助尚不确定,但 O'Shaughnessy 确信容量置换是控制这种疾病的关键。我们了解到:

1831 年 9 月,英格兰爆发了亚洲霍乱。面对不断上升的死亡率和缺乏有效的治疗方法,医学界掌握了一系列经验疗法,从口服辣椒到松节油灌肠。为了应对合理治疗的需要,一位名叫威廉·布鲁克·奥肖内西的年轻医生被说服研究霍乱血液的化学病理学。这些研究奠定了现代静脉输液治疗的基础。同一个人后来成为电报领域的先驱,并在不经意间为英国历史做出了重大贡献。

我们对脉管系统的理解、动脉只是心脏的宏伟延伸(反之亦然)、心脏的血管舒缩控制和血压调节在容量评估中起着关键作用。例如,300 年前 de Sénac 写道;“动脉(和心脏)有相同的运动;它们不停地交替扩张和收缩。” 3动脉内在的力量取决于它们的肌肉纤维和它们的长度。迄今为止,我们对心血管树的调节关注了 300 年,直到 McGee 等人的研究,4在“分子”时代之前,把我们带到了现在的位置。我们被赋予了循环内在、局部、神经元和中枢调节的合理知识。这些进步不能被遗忘。3超过 300 年的心血管研究包括 Bernard、Brown-Sequard、Magendie、Bayliss、Gaskell、Langley、Cannon、Dale、Frank、Starling、Hering 和其他人的贡献。这些杰出的研究人员将生理学放在了他们的(还不是分子生物学)肩膀上,更不用说低血压、高血压、中枢神经系统、心血管、渗透压和肾脏容量以及调节的临床相关性。

更新日期:2020-05-23
down
wechat
bug