当前位置: X-MOL 学术 › › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Ethics Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Violence Risk Assessment.
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law ( IF 2.807 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-14 , DOI: 10.29158/jaapl.003940-20
Richard G Cockerill 1
Affiliation  

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the landscape of medicine. Specifically, algorithms powered by deep learning are already gaining increasingly wide adoption in fields such as radiology, pathology, and preventive medicine. Forensic psychiatry is a complex and intricate specialty that seeks to balance the disparate approaches of psychiatric science, which strives to explain human behavior deterministically, and the law, which emphasizes free choice and moral responsibility. This balancing, a central task of the forensic psychiatrist, is necessarily fraught with ambiguity. Such a complex task may intuitively seem impenetrable to artificial intelligence. This article first aims to challenge this assumption and then seeks to address the unique concerns posed by the adoption of artificial intelligence in violence risk assessment and prediction. The relevant ethics concerns are analyzed within the framework of traditional bioethics principles. Finally, recommendations for practitioners, ethicists, and others are offered as a starting point for further discussion.

中文翻译:

在暴力风险评估中使用人工智能的伦理学意义。

人工智能正在迅速改变医学的面貌。具体而言,由深度学习提供支持的算法已在放射学,病理学和预防医学等领域得到越来越广泛的采用。法医精神病学是一个复杂而复杂的专业,旨在平衡精神科学的不同方法和方法,后者强调确定性地解释人类的行为,而法律则强调自由选择和道德责任。这种平衡是法医精神科医生的一项核心任务,必然充满歧义。如此复杂的任务在直观上似乎对人工智能是不可穿透的。本文首先旨在挑战这一假设,然后寻求解决在暴力风险评估和预测中采用人工智能带来的独特关注。在传统生物伦理原则的框架内分析了有关伦理问题。最后,为从业者,伦理学家和其他人提供建议,作为进一步讨论的起点。
更新日期:2020-05-14
down
wechat
bug