OBJECTIVES The present mixed-methods study examines allyship as a politicized collective identity and its associations with ethnic identity, personality traits, and sociopolitical engagement among IPPOC. METHOD Participants in two samples in 2016 (n = 256) and 2017 (n = 305) completed measures of ally identity, ethnic identity, personality traits, and political engagement. RESULTS Results indicate two factors of ally identity (ally beliefs and behaviors). Quantitative findings suggest a) ethnic identity exploration predicts ally beliefs and behaviors, b) extraversion predicts ally behaviors, while agreeableness and neuroticism predicts ally beliefs, and c) ally beliefs and behaviors predict awareness, while ethnic identity exploration predicts involvement in political action, even when personality traits are considered. Thematic analysis findings suggest IPPOC allies are politically engaged through social media, individual actions, protests, and civic engagement. CONCLUSIONS Ethnic and ally identity provide different paths to sociopolitical awareness and involvement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

当个人是政治性的时：原住民和有色人种之间的民族身份、盟友身份以及政治参与。


目标 目前的混合方法研究考察了作为一种政治化集体身份的盟友关系及其与 IPPOC 中的种族身份、人格特征和社会政治参与的关系。方法 2016 年 (n = 256) 和 2017 年 (n = 305) 两个样本的参与者完成了盟友身份、种族身份、人格特征和政治参与的测量。结果 结果表明了盟友身份的两个因素（盟友信念和行为）。定量研究结果表明，a）种族身份探索预测盟友信仰和行为，b）外向性预测盟友行为，而宜人性和神经质预测盟友信仰，c）盟友信仰和行为预测意识，而种族身份探索预测参与政治行动，甚至当考虑到性格特征时。主题分析结果表明，IPPOC 盟友通过社交媒体、个人行动、抗议和公民参与进行政治参与。结论 种族和盟友身份为社会政治意识和参与提供了不同的途径。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。