ABSTRACT While Freud was often ambivalent about the clinical aspects of psychoanalysis,he remained enamored of his theory of the mind and elaborated it over the entire course of his life. Occasionally, an analyst identified himself or herself as making major additions or alternatives to Freud’s original definition, leading to separate schools of psychoanalysis. Technique, on the other hand, was often assumed to remain the same with the analyst’s role severely constricted with regard to interactive warmth and caring. Why is this? The answer lies in the perception that a treatment depending significantly on the personality and life experience of the analyst cannot be generalized but would be judged as the influence of a powerful analyst acting according to his or her individuality. Who benefits from such a distancing stance on the analyst’s part? Certainly not the patient, but definitely not the analyst. For analysts, the need to have psychoanalysis survive as a therapy that can compete as the one therapy based upon an intimate and deep experience of mutual understanding, requires that it radically change from the vision of its founder, brilliant and creative as it was when he became the first psychoanalyst and the father of psychoanalysis.

中文翻译：

---

分析师对真实性的需求和抗拒：使精神分析成为真正的两人体验

摘要 虽然弗洛伊德对精神分析的临床方面常常持矛盾态度，但他仍然迷恋于他的心理理论，并在他的整个生命过程中对其进行了阐述。有时，分析师认为自己对弗洛伊德的原始定义进行了重大补充或替代，从而导致精神分析学派的产生。另一方面，技术通常被认为保持不变，分析师的角色在互动温暖和关怀方面受到严重限制。为什么是这样？答案在于这样一种看法，即严重依赖于分析师的个性和生活经历的治疗不能一概而论，而是会被判断为强大的分析师根据他或她的个性行事的影响。谁从分析师的这种疏远立场中受益？当然不是病人，但绝对不是分析师。对于分析家来说，精神分析作为一种能够与一种基于相互理解的深入体验的疗法竞争的疗法生存的需要，需要它彻底改变其创始人的愿景，就像他当初的辉煌和创造性一样。 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?成为第一位精神分析学家和精神分析之父。