Online oxygen (δ ¹⁸O) and hydrogen (δ ²H) isotope analysis of fluid inclusion water entrapped in minerals is widely applied in paleo‐fluid studies. In the state of the art of fluid inclusion isotope research, however, there is a scarcity of reported inter‐technique comparisons to account for possible analytical offsets. Along with improving analytical precisions and sample size limitations, interlaboratory comparisons can lead to a more robust application of fluid inclusion isotope records.

中文翻译：

---

同位素比质谱法与腔衰荡光谱技术在流体包裹体同位素分析中的比较。

在线氧（δ ¹⁸ O）和氢（δ ² 2H）同位素的矿物质截留的流体夹杂物的水分析广泛应用于古流体研究。然而，在流体包裹体同位素研究的最新状态中，缺乏报道的技术间比较来说明可能的分析偏移。随着分析精度的提高和样品量的限制，实验室间的比较可以使流体包裹体同位素记录的应用更加可靠。