Wireless communication is more prone to random loss than wired communication because of noise and mobility. Over years researchers have developed TCP variants that do not decrease the send window when random loss arises. Years ago it was introduced TCP CERL algorithm that proved to present a high performance compared to other protocols. Here, we test CERL assuming two-way transmission of relatively heavy load and compare with TCP BIC, TCP NewReno, TCP Westwood+, TCP NewJersey and TCP Illinois. Simulation Results show that TCP CERL gains a 145%, 137%, 120%, 97% and 125% throughput improvement over New Reno, Bic, Westwood+, New Jersey and Illinois, respectively.

由于噪声和移动性，无线通信比有线通信更容易出现随机丢失。多年来，研究人员已经开发出TCP变体，当出现随机丢失时，它们不会减小发送窗口。几年前，它被引入TCP CERL算法，与其他协议相比，该算法被证明具有更高的性能。在这里，我们以相对较重的负载双向传输来测试CERL，并将其与TCP BIC，TCP NewReno，TCP Westwood +，TCP NewJersey和TCP Illinois进行比较。仿真结果表明，TCP CERL与New Reno，Bic，Westwood +，New Jersey和Illinois相比，吞吐量分别提高了145％，137％，120％，97％和125％。