当前位置: X-MOL 学术Appl. Ergon. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Specifying advantages of multi-modal cueing: Quantifying improvements with augmented tactile information.
Applied Ergonomics ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-16 , DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103146
Timothy L White 1 , P A Hancock 2
Affiliation  

This work examines how tactile cues, encoded with azimuth and distance information, compare with visual and speech cues on performance and mental workload in a target detection task. Two experiments are reported using a simulated environment in which targets were presented at varying azimuth and distance locations. In the first experiment, participants engaged targets both while stationary and while in motion using tactile, visual, or speech cues. A no cueing control was included. In the second multi-modal experiment, participants completed the same task using cue pairings. Performance metrics consisted of hits, misses due to non-detection, misses due to inaccurate engagement, false alarms, response time, navigation errors as well as subjective ratings of mental workload scores were also collected. Results demonstrate the superiority of tactile cues as a means to communicate target location information either as a single modality or when paired with the two other cue types.

中文翻译:

指定多模式提示的优势:增强触觉信息以量化改进。

这项工作研究了在目标检测任务中,以方位角和距离信息编码的触觉提示与视觉和语音提示在性能和精神工作量上的对比。使用模拟环境报告了两个实验,其中在不同的方位角和距离位置显示目标。在第一个实验中,参与者使用触觉,视觉或语音提示在静止和运动时都接合目标。包括无提示控件。在第二个多模式实验中,参与者使用提示配对完成了相同的任务。还收集了性能指标,包括命中率,由于未检测到而导致的遗漏,由于不正确的参与而导致的遗漏,错误警报,响应时间,导航错误以及精神工作量得分的主观评分。
更新日期:2020-05-16
down
wechat
bug