当前位置: X-MOL 学术Brain Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task.
Brain Sciences ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-14 , DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10050290
Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian 1 , Ryan Gilley 1 , Danielle Andrew 1 , Bernadette Murphy 1 , Paul Yielder 1
Affiliation  

During training in a novel dynamic environment, the non-dominant upper limb favors feedback control, whereas the dominant limb favors feedforward mechanisms. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) offer a means to explore differences in cortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration (SMI). This study sought to compare differences in SMI between the right (Dom) and left (Non-Dom) hand in healthy right-handed participants. SEPs were recorded in response to median nerve stimulation, at baseline and post, a motor skill acquisition-tracing task. One group (n = 12) trained with their Dom hand and the other group (n = 12), with their Non-Dom hand. The Non-Dom hand was significantly more accurate at baseline (p < 0.0001) and both groups improved with time (p < 0.0001), for task accuracy, with no significant interaction effect between groups for both post-acquisition and retention. There were significant group interactions for the N24 (p < 0.001) and the N30 (p < 0.0001) SEP peaks. Post motor acquisition, the Dom hand had a 28.9% decrease in the N24 and a 23.8% increase in the N30, with opposite directional changes for the Non-Dom hand; 22.04% increase in N24 and 24% decrease in the N30. These SEP changes reveal differences in early SMI between Dom and Non-Dom hands in response to motor acquisition, providing objective, temporally sensitive measures of differences in neural mechanisms between the limbs.

中文翻译:

遵循一种新颖的运动追踪任务后,在显性和非显性手之间的早期体感诱发电位的差异变化。

在新颖的动态环境中进行训练时,非显性上肢有利于反馈控制,而显性上肢有利于前馈机制。早期的体感诱发电位(SEP)提供了一种探索参与感觉运动整合(SMI)的皮质区域差异的方法。这项研究旨在比较健康的右撇子参与者在右手(Dom)和左手(Non-Dom)之间的SMI差异。在基线和运动技能习得跟踪任务后,响应中位神经刺激记录SEP。一组(n = 12)用Dom手训练,另一组(n = 12)用非Dom手训练。对于任务准确度,非Dom手在基线时的准确度明显更高(p <0.0001),并且两组随时间的推移有所改善(p <0.0001),两组之间在获取后和保留方面都没有明显的交互作用。N24(p <0.001)和N30(p <0.0001)SEP峰存在显着的组间相互作用。运动后,Dom手的N24下降28.9%,N30增加23.8%,与非Dom的方向相反。N24上升22.04%,N30下降24%。这些SEP变化揭示了响应运动获取的Dom和非Dom手之间早期SMI的差异,从而提供了客观,时间敏感的四肢之间神经机制差异的度量。N24下降9%,N30增长23.8%,非Dom手的方向变化相反;N24上升22.04%,N30下降24%。这些SEP变化揭示了响应运动获取的Dom和非Dom手之间早期SMI的差异,从而提供了客观,时间敏感的四肢之间神经机制差异的度量。N24下降9%,N30增长23.8%,非Dom手的方向变化相反;N24上升22.04%,N30下降24%。这些SEP变化揭示了响应运动获取的Dom和非Dom手之间早期SMI的差异,从而提供了对肢体之间神经机制差异的客观,时间敏感的测量。
更新日期:2020-05-14
down
wechat
bug