In the recent past, the information and analysis centre of Russia began providing GNSS static data processing operating in experimental mode. Since this service processes data in static mode only, the service is compared with the OPUS static service. OPUS produces better results for the points in the USA. OPUS produced slightly better results for the point with nearby ITRF reference stations than for a point far away from the ITRF reference stations. The Russian system did not differentiate between the point with nearby ITRF reference stations and the point which is far away from ITRF reference stations. In addition, for both services, having a longer observation period did not substantially improve the quality of the solutions for all coordinates. Additionally, coordinate differences between OPUS results and the Russian system results are in the order of decimetres.

最近，俄罗斯信息与分析中心开始提供以实验模式运行的GNSS静态数据处理。由于此服务仅以静态模式处理数据，因此将该服务与OPUS静态服务进行比较。在美国，OPUS产生更好的结果。与附近的ITRF参考站相比，OPUS产生的点的结果要好于远离ITRF参考站的点。俄罗斯系统并未区分附近有ITRF参考站的点和远离ITRF参考站的点。此外，对于这两种服务，观察期较长不会显着提高所有坐标的解决方案质量。另外，