We provide an addendum vis-à-vis Mandiwana-Neudani et al. (2019a) on the taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of ‘true’ francolins: Galliformes, Phasianidae, Phasianinae, Gallini; Francolinus, Ortygornis, Afrocolinus gen. nov., Peliperdix and Scleroptila spp., Mandiwana-Neudani et al. (2019b). Mandiwana-Neudani et al. (2019a) proposed the use of a new generic epithet, Afrocolinus, for Latham’s Francolin Francolinus lathami and restricting Peliperdix to an expanded set of Hall’s (1963) Red-tailed francolins. However, Afrocolinus cannot be used for lathami, because lathami is the type species for the genus Peliperdix (Bonaparte, 1856). We suggest a solution to resolve this nomenclatural conundrum; restrict the use of Peliperdix to lathami and move species taxa currently placed in Peliperdix into a new genus, namely Campocolinus.

我们提供了Mandiwana-Neudani等人的附录。（2019a）关于``真正的''francolins的分类，系统发育和生物地理学：Galliformes，Phasianidae，Phasianinae，Gallini; Francolinus，Ortygornis，Afrocolinus gen。11月，Peliperdix和Scleroptila spp。，Mandiwana-Neudani等。（2019b）。Mandiwana-Neudani等。（2019a）提议将新的通用称谓Afrocolinus用于Latham的Francolin Francolinus lathami，并将Peliperdix限于Hall（1963）的红尾francolins的扩展集。但是，Afrocolinus不能用于lathami，因为lathami是该属的类型种Peliperdix（Bonaparte，1856年）。我们建议一种解决此命名难题的解决方案。限制使用Peliperdix到lathami类群当前摆在和移动物种Peliperdix到一个新属，即Campocolinus。