The following aesthetic discussion examines in a philosophical-scientific way the relationship between computation and artistic creativity. Currently, there is a criticism about the possible artistic creativity that an algorithm could have. Supporting the above, the term computer-generated art (CG-Art) defined by Margaret Boden would seem to have no exponents yet. Moreover, it has been pointed out that, rather than a matter of primitive technological development, CG-Art would have in its very foundations the inability to exist. This, because art is considered as one of the most unique and exclusive human manifestations of our species. On the contrary, I propose that the denial of CG-Art has an anthropocentric bias. For this, I use the recent studies that, from the cognitive sciences, have been carried out on artistic creativity. In this way, I intend to convince the reader that behind the denial of the creative artistic capacity to the machines, a negationist mysticism of the current scientific advances necessarily lies.

中文翻译：

---

CG-Art：揭开艺术创造力以人类为中心的偏见的神秘面纱

以下美学讨论以哲学科学的方式检验了计算与艺术创造力之间的关系。目前，对算法可能具有的艺术创造力存在批评。支持上述观点，由 Margaret Boden 定义的计算机生成艺术（CG-Art）一词似乎还没有指数。此外，有人指出，与其说是原始技术发展的问题，不如说 CG-Art 在其基础上无法存在。这是因为艺术被认为是我们物种中最独特和排他性的人类表现之一。相反，我认为对 CG-Art 的否定带有以人类为中心的偏见。为此，我使用了认知科学中最近对艺术创造力进行的研究。这样，