Supported by a large body of scholarship, it is increasingly orthodox practice for cities to deploy urban greening interventions to address diverse socioenvironmental challenges, from protecting urban ecosystems to enhancing built environments and climate resilience or improving health outcomes. In this article, we expand the theoretical boundaries used to challenge this growing orthodoxy by laying out a nuanced framework that advances critical urban environmental justice scholarship. Beginning from the now well-supported assumption that urban greening is a deeply political project often framed by technocratic principles and promotional claims that this project will result in more just and prosperous cities, we identify existing contributions and limits when examining urban green inequities through the traditional lenses of distributional, recognition, and procedural justice. We then advocate for and lay out a different analytical framework for analyzing justice in urban greening. We argue that new research must uncover how persistent domination and subordination prevent green interventions from becoming an emancipatory antisubordination, intersectional, and relational project that considers the needs, identities, and everyday lives of marginalized groups. Finally, we illustrate our framework’s usefulness by applying it to the analysis of urban residents’ (lack of) access to urban greening and by operationalizing it for two different planning and policy domains: (1) greening for well-being, care, and health and (2) greening for recreation and play. This final analysis serves to provide critical questions and strategies that can hopefully guide new urban green planning and practice approaches.

在大量奖学金的支持下，越来越多的传统做法是城市部署城市绿化干预措施来应对各种社会环境挑战，从保护城市生态系统到增强建筑环境和气候适应力或改善健康结果。在本文中，我们通过提出一个细致入微的框架来扩展关键的城市环境正义奖学金，从而扩展了用来挑战这种正统观念的理论界限。从现在得到充分支持的假设开始，即城市绿化是一个深深的政治项目，通常由技术专家原则和宣传声称构成，该项目将导致更公正，更繁荣的城市，在通过传统方法研究城市绿色不平等时，我们确定了现有的贡献和局限性分配镜头 承认和程序正义。然后，我们主张并提出一个不同的分析框架来分析城市绿化中的正义。我们认为，新的研究必须揭示持续的统治和从属地位如何防止绿色干预成为考虑到边缘群体的需求，身份和日常生活的解放性的从属，交叉和关系项目。最后，我们通过将其应用于分析城市居民（缺乏）城市绿化的机会并针对两个不同的规划和政策领域对其进行操作来说明我们的框架的有用性：（1）为幸福，护理和健康提供绿化（2）绿化休闲娱乐。