ABSTRACT This response to the foregoing reviews of The Poetry and Music of Science identifies common themes raised by them, responds to direct questions where this is possible and suggests further avenues of discussion. It focusses in particular on issues of the historical and cultural setting of human creativity, the particular issues raised by poetry, the differences between artistic and scientific imagination, the confusion (and de-confusion) of ‘imagination' and ‘creativity', the social and institutional framings of the sciences and the arts, the question of digital creativity and theological themes. A common emerging idea is that human creativity, whether artistic or scientific, is well-described by neither purely ‘expressive' nor ‘receptive’ actions but by a meeting of both.

中文翻译：

---

继续讨论

摘要 对上述《科学诗歌和音乐》评论的回应确定了他们提出的共同主题，在可能的情况下回答了直接问题，并提出了进一步的讨论途径。它特别关注人类创造力的历史和文化背景、诗歌引发的特殊问题、艺术想象和科学想象之间的差异、“想象”和“创造力”的混淆（和去混淆）、社会科学和艺术的制度框架，数字创造力和神学主题的问题。一个普遍的新兴想法是，人类的创造力，无论是艺术的还是科学的，都不是纯粹的“表达”或“接受”行为，而是两者的结合。