The Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 (HASHAA) was passed under urgency to deal with housing affordability and land supply challenges across New Zealand. Representing a particular response at a particular point in time, the HASHAA was introduced under urgency and included provisions that allowed the Crown to override (housing) decisions of local authorities. Using post‐political theory in the analysis of evidence collected from transcripts from New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), this paper exposes how processes and provisions of the HASHAA were an erosion of democracy.

中文翻译：

---

《 2013年住房协议和特殊住房地区法》与民主的侵蚀

紧急通过《 2013年住房协议和特殊住房地区法》（HASHAA），以应对新西兰各地的住房负担能力和土地供应挑战。HASHAA代表着在特定时间点的特定回应，因此是在紧急情况下引入的，其中包括允许官方推翻地方当局（房屋）决策的规定。本文使用后政治理论对从新西兰国会辩论（Hansard）的笔录中收集的证据进行分析，从而揭示了HASHAA的程序和规定是如何侵蚀民主的。