当前位置: X-MOL 学术Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabilit. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The association of initial provider type on opioid fills for individuals with neck pain
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ( IF 3.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.002
Christopher J Louis 1 , Carolina-Nicole S Herrera 1 , Brigid M Garrity 2 , Christine M McDonough 3 , Howard Cabral 4 , Robert B Saper 5 , Lewis E Kazis 2
Affiliation  

OBJECTIVE To determine whether the initial provider of care for neck pain was associated with opioid use for people with neck pain. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Marketscan™ research databases PARTICIPANTS: 427,966 patients with new-onset neck pain from 2010 to 2014 MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Opioid use was defined using retail pharmacy fills. We performed logistic regression analysis to assess the association between initial provider and opioid use. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using bootstrapping logistic models. We performed propensity score matching as a robustness check on our findings. RESULTS Compared to patients with neck pain who saw a PCP, patients with neck pain who initially saw a conservative therapist were 72% to 91% less likely to fill an opioid prescription in the first 30 days, and between 41% to 87% less likely to continue filling prescriptions for 1 year. People with neck pain who initially saw emergency medicine physicians had the highest odds of opioid use during the first 30 days (OR: 3.58 [95% CI: 3.47 to 3.69, p<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS A patient's initial clinical contact for neck pain may be an important opportunity to influence subsequent opioid use. Understanding more about the roles that conservative therapists play in the treatment of neck pain may be key in unlocking new ways to lessen the burden of opioid use in the U.S.

中文翻译:

初始提供者类型对颈部疼痛患者阿片类药物填充的关联

目的 确定颈部疼痛的初始护理提供者是否与颈部疼痛患者使用阿片类药物有关。设计 回顾性队列研究 设置:Marketscan™ 研究数据库 参与者:427,966 名 2010 年至 2014 年间新发颈部疼痛的患者 主要观察指标:阿片类药物的使用是使用零售药房填充物定义的。我们进行逻辑回归分析以评估初始提供者与阿片类药物使用之间的关联。使用自举逻辑模型计算具有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的调整优势比 (OR)。我们进行了倾向评分匹配,作为对我们发现的稳健性检查。结果 与看 PCP 的颈部疼痛患者相比,最初看保守治疗师的颈部疼痛患者在前 30 天内服用阿片类药物处方的可能性降低了 72% 到 91%,并且在一年内继续服用阿片类药物的可能性降低了 41% 到 87%。最初看急诊医生的颈部疼痛患者在前 30 天内使用阿片类药物的几率最高(OR:3.58 [95% CI:3.47 至 3.69,p<0.001])。结论 患者最初的颈部疼痛临床接触可能是影响随后使用阿片类药物的重要机会。更多地了解保守治疗师在治疗颈部疼痛中的作用可能是开启减轻美国阿片类药物使用负担的新方法的关键 最初看急诊医生的颈部疼痛患者在前 30 天内使用阿片类药物的几率最高(OR:3.58 [95% CI:3.47 至 3.69,p<0.001])。结论 患者最初的颈部疼痛临床接触可能是影响随后使用阿片类药物的重要机会。更多地了解保守治疗师在治疗颈部疼痛中所起的作用可能是开启减轻美国阿片类药物使用负担的新方法的关键 最初看急诊医生的颈部疼痛患者在前 30 天内使用阿片类药物的几率最高(OR:3.58 [95% CI:3.47 至 3.69,p<0.001])。结论 患者最初的颈部疼痛临床接触可能是影响随后使用阿片类药物的重要机会。更多地了解保守治疗师在治疗颈部疼痛中的作用可能是开启减轻美国阿片类药物使用负担的新方法的关键
更新日期:2020-08-01
down
wechat
bug