Abstract Reconciliation is well documented in a number of species, including nonhuman primates, dolphins, wolves, and many others. Researchers studied domestic dogs in a variety of natural and artificially-created packs. While each report some evidence of reconciliation, they found more dispersal than reconciliation occurred postconflict, with cohort relationships being a factor. In the present study, we observed which of three reconciliation theories best predicted observed behavior (Reconciled Hierarchy Hypothesis, Good Relationship Hypothesis, Uncertainty Reduction Hypothesis). We studied reconciliation in domestic dogs in a fluid, changing group of domestic dogs visiting a fenced two-acre dog park. In 72 one-hour sessions across eight months, 177 dogs were observed. There were 14 dyadic conflicts involving 21 dogs—eleven demonstrated postconflict reconciliation. During Baseline, Victims were significantly more affiliative than were Aggressors (F(1,20) = 15.67, p

中文翻译：

---

家犬的和解（Canis熟悉）：不确定性减少假设的证据

摘要 和解在许多物种中都有很好的记录，包括非人类灵长类动物、海豚、狼和许多其他物种。研究人员研究了各种天然和人造包装中的家犬。虽然每个人都报告了一些和解的证据，但他们发现冲突后发生的和解比和解更多，队列关系是一个因素。在本研究中，我们观察了三种和解理论中的哪一种最能预测观察到的行为（协调层次假设、良好关系假设、不确定性减少假设）。我们在一个流动的、不断变化的家犬群中研究了家犬的和解，它们参观了一个占地两英亩的围栏狗公园。在八个月的 72 次一小时会议中，观察了 177 只狗。有 14 次二元冲突涉及 21 只狗——其中 11 次证明了冲突后的和解。在基线期间，受害者的亲和性明显高于攻击者 (F(1,20) = 15.67, p