Mindfulness and acceptance-based psychotherapies have gained popularity in the last few decades as a “third wave” of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Acceptance is an important factor in all of these psychotherapies and stems from Asian philosophies, therefore similarities are necessarily seen between the psychotherapies themselves. This paper aims to demonstrate the ways in which acceptance-based psychotherapies converge by virtue of sharing the same philosophical root, as well as how they diverge in their applications of this concept. Specifically, this paper will examine similarities and differences in the concept of acceptance amongst the therapeutic models of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, as compared to the Asian philosophical traditions of Buddhism and Hinduism. Acceptance in these psychotherapies will first be collectively compared with that of the Asian philosophical traditions, then key similarities and differences will be highlighted among the psychotherapies themselves. A secondary aim of this paper is to illustrate REBT as an acceptance-based psychotherapy, though it is not often included in discussions of third wave acceptance-based CBTs.

中文翻译：

---

基于接纳的疗法与亚洲哲学传统：接纳概念的异同

在过去的几十年中，正念和基于接受的心理疗法作为认知行为疗法 (CBT) 的“第三波”越来越受欢迎。接受是所有这些心理治疗中的一个重要因素，并且源于亚洲哲学，因此在心理治疗之间必然会看到相似之处。本文旨在展示基于接受的心理疗法通过共享相同的哲学根源而融合的方式，以及它们如何在这一概念的应用中产生分歧。具体而言，本文将探讨理性情绪行为疗法 (REBT)、辩证行为疗法、接受与承诺疗法以及基于正念的认知疗法等治疗模式中接受概念的异同，与佛教和印度教的亚洲哲学传统相比。这些心理疗法的接受度将首先与亚洲哲学传统的接受度进行集体比较，然后将突出心理疗法本身之间的关键异同。本文的第二个目的是将 REBT 说明为基于接受的心理疗法，尽管它通常不包含在第三波基于接受的 CBT 的讨论中。