Contact- versus noncontact-guided ablation of the right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: A propensity score matched analysis.,Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Contact- versus noncontact-guided ablation of the right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: A propensity score matched analysis.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-03 , DOI: 10.1111/pace.13935
Xinguang Chen ₁ , Ling Sun ₁ , Qiushi Chen ₁ , Pipin Kojodjojo ₂ , Hongwu Chen ₁ , Weizhu Ju ₁ , Wenwu Zhu ₁ , Yeqian Zhu ₁ , Pengcheng Zhao ₁ , Fengxiang Zhang _{1,

3} , Minglong Chen ₁

Affiliation

There are unique advantages and disadvantages in the choice of contact mapping (CM) versus noncontact mapping (NCM) systems during ablation of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) arrhythmias. This study compared acute procedural success and clinical outcomes in matched patients undergoing CM‐ versus NCM‐guided RVOT ablation.

中文翻译：