当前位置: X-MOL 学术Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Contact- versus noncontact-guided ablation of the right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: A propensity score matched analysis.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-03 , DOI: 10.1111/pace.13935
Xinguang Chen 1 , Ling Sun 1 , Qiushi Chen 1 , Pipin Kojodjojo 2 , Hongwu Chen 1 , Weizhu Ju 1 , Wenwu Zhu 1 , Yeqian Zhu 1 , Pengcheng Zhao 1 , Fengxiang Zhang 1, 3 , Minglong Chen 1
Affiliation  

There are unique advantages and disadvantages in the choice of contact mapping (CM) versus noncontact mapping (NCM) systems during ablation of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) arrhythmias. This study compared acute procedural success and clinical outcomes in matched patients undergoing CM‐ versus NCM‐guided RVOT ablation.

中文翻译:

右心室流出道心律失常的接触与非接触引导消融:倾向评分匹配分析。

在消融右心室流出道 (RVOT) 心律失常期间,接触标测 (CM) 与非接触标测 (NCM) 系统的选择具有独特的优点和缺点。本研究比较了接受 CM 与 NCM 引导的 RVOT 消融的匹配患者的急性手术成功率和临床结果。
更新日期:2020-05-03
down
wechat
bug