当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ecol. Econ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How do resource mobility and group size affect institutional arrangements for rule enforcement? A qualitative comparative analysis of fishing groups in South Korea
Ecological Economics ( IF 6.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106657
Hoon C. Shin , David J. Yu , Samuel Park , John M. Anderies , Joshua K. Abbott , Marco A. Janssen , T.K. Ahn

Two social feedbacks critical for redressing decline in organizational performance are exit (changing membership to a better performing organization) and voice (members' expression of discontent). In self-governing organizations of common-pool resources (CPRs) experiencing decline from poor rule conformance, the exit option is often unavailable due to a closed membership policy. Thus, members should rely on the voice option to reverse the trend. However, it is poorly understood under what set of conditions members can successfully use the voice option to govern their CPRs. We analyzed 30 self-governing fishing groups in South Korea to generate configurations of institutional and social-ecological conditions linked to the successful voice option. We considered Ostrom's Design Principles for rule enforcement as institutional conditions and resource mobility and group size as social-ecological factors affecting institutional fit. We find that if the informal mechanism for conflict resolution is absent, fishing groups will be unsuccessful; even if rules for monitoring and graduated sanctions are not in use, groups can be successful when they harvest only stationary resources and the informal conflict-resolution is present; and groups managing mobile resources need graduated sanctions to be successful, while those appropriating only stationary resources can achieve the same outcome without such sanctions.

中文翻译:

资源流动性和群体规模如何影响规则执行的制度安排?韩国渔业群体定性比较分析

对纠正组织绩效下降至关重要的两个社会反馈是退出(将成员资格更改为绩效更好的组织)和声音(成员表达不满)。在公共池资源 (CPR) 的自治组织中,由于规则遵从性差而下降,由于封闭的成员资格政策,退出选项通常不可用。因此,成员应该依靠语音选项来扭转趋势。然而,在什么样的条件下,成员可以成功地使用语音选项来管理他们的 CPR,人们知之甚少。我们分析了韩国的 30 个自治渔业团体,以生成与成功的语音选项相关的制度和社会生态条件的配置。我们考虑过奥斯特罗姆 ■ 作为制度条件和资源流动性的规则执行设计原则,以及作为影响制度适应的社会生态因素的群体规模。我们发现,如果没有非正式的冲突解决机制,渔业组织就会失败;即使没有使用监督和分级制裁规则,如果小组只收获固定资源并且存在非正式的冲突解决办法,他们也可以取得成功;管理移动资源的团体需要分级制裁才能取得成功,而那些只占用固定资源的团体可以在没有此类制裁的情况下取得相同的结果。即使没有使用监督和分级制裁规则,如果小组只收获固定资源并且存在非正式的冲突解决办法,他们也可以取得成功;管理移动资源的团体需要分级制裁才能取得成功,而那些只占用固定资源的团体可以在没有此类制裁的情况下取得相同的结果。即使没有使用监督和分级制裁规则,如果小组只收获固定资源并且存在非正式的冲突解决办法,他们也可以取得成功;管理移动资源的团体需要分级制裁才能取得成功,而那些只占用固定资源的团体可以在没有此类制裁的情况下取得相同的结果。
更新日期:2020-08-01
down
wechat
bug