Abstract Sanders et al.'s proposal for a management framework for conflicting interests among program developers is very welcome. The underlying principles of such a framework must nevertheless prioritise the need for researchers and commissioners of services to make objective assessments of the impact of interventions reported in journal articles. This is particularly important in the field of randomised trials which may influence public sector expenditure. Using a strict definition derived from known financial conflict of interest, we have demonstrated that child‐based effect sizes are much lower for independent studies than for studies with developer involvement. On this basis, we propose that journals publishing evaluations of psychosocial interventions should agree a standardised format for declarations of conflicts of interest based on that recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

中文翻译：

---

读者和服务专员需要明确的财务披露：对创新、研究诚信和变革的评论：程序开发人员的利益冲突管理框架（Sanders 等，2019）

摘要 Sanders 等人关于程序开发人员之间利益冲突的管理框架的提议非常受欢迎。然而，这种框架的基本原则必须优先考虑研究人员和服务专员对期刊文章中报道的干预措施的影响进行客观评估的需求。这在可能影响公共部门支出的随机试验领域尤为重要。使用源自已知财务利益冲突的严格定义，我们已经证明独立研究的基于儿童的效应量远低于有开发人员参与的研究。以这个为基础，