This article examines macro-level contextual parameters and individual-based factors deemed in the literature to directly influence individuals’ daily mobility practices. It considers the urban structure, place of residence, situation in the social hierarchy, and position in the life course. Taking its inspiration from approaches highlighting segregation at destination place and studies focusing on mobility biographies, it enquires whether systematic discrepancies may be detected between the places frequented for work or study on a daily basis by the groups of individuals residing in the same neighborhood. It also looks at whether home location (in a central area, inner suburb, or outskirt) influences how action spaces are configured. The analysis relies on a three-phase integrated method. First, a typology of individuals is assembled to put together homogenous socio-demographic groups. Second, the action spaces of these groups are calculated and mapped. Third, the significance of spatial differences in action spaces is assessed using a bivariate colocation test, hitherto used primarily in spatial epidemiology. This three-phase method is applied to data collected in Santiago de Chile during a survey of 1,000 households, designed to capture spatial mobility from a biographical perspective.

中文翻译：

---

住附近，与众不同，分开工作？智利圣地亚哥行动空间差异的一些启示

本文研究了宏观层面的语境参数和文献中认为直接影响个人日常出行习惯的基于个人的因素。它考虑了城市结构，居住地，社会等级中的情况以及生活过程中的位置。它从强调目的地隔离的方法和针对流动性传记的研究中汲取了灵感，它询问居住在同一社区的个人群体是否每天都可以检测到频繁出入工作或学习的地点之间的系统差异。它还研究了居家位置（在中心区域，内郊区或郊区）是否影响动作空间的配置。该分析依赖于三相集成方法。第一的，汇集了个人的类型，以将同质的社会人口群体组合在一起。其次，计算并映射这些组的动作空间。第三，行动空间中空间差异的重要性使用迄今为止主要用于空间流行病学中的双变量共置检验进行评估。此三阶段方法应用于在智利圣地亚哥进行的对1,000户家庭的调查中收集的数据，旨在从传记的角度捕获空间流动性。