In comparison with constant static pressure and total air volume control strategies, a static pressure reset strategy for variable static pressure control of Variable Air Volume (VAV) air conditioning systems shows evident energy-saving potential. How to establish a relationship between feedback parameters representing the load demand and duct static pressure setpoint has been attached great importance to. This study provides a novel static pressure reset strategy with a linear adjustment algorithm to build a simple linear functional relation between the terminal maximum damper position and the static pressure setpoint. Also, the robust regions are introduced into the algorithm to enhance the system stability and online applicability. Experiments are conducted to compare the proposed strategy with a fixed static pressure strategy and a static pressure reset strategy with a fixed step value in an integrated experimental control system for a VAV system. Experimental results indicate that all three strategies can realize real-time control of room temperature while the proposed strategy has better stability with the least number of setpoint reset times. The mean of the damper position is 16.74% and 8.56% higher than the other two strategies accompanying with a minimum of 5% energy saving of the proposed control method.

与恒定静压和总风量控制策略相比，用于可变风量（VAV）空调系统的可变静压控制的静压复位策略具有明显的节能潜力。如何建立代表负载需求的反馈参数与管道静压设定点之间的关系已成为非常重要的工作。这项研究提供了一种新颖的静态压力重置策略，该策略具有线性调整算法，可在终端最大阻尼器位置和静态压力设定点之间建立简单的线性函数关系。而且，将鲁棒区域引入算法中，以增强系统稳定性和在线适用性。在VAV系统的集成实验控制系统中，进行了实验，以将所提出的策略与固定静压策略和具有固定步长值的静压复位策略进行比较。实验结果表明，这三种策略都可以实现对室温的实时控制，而所提出的策略具有更好的稳定性，且设定点复位次数最少。阻尼器位置的平均值比其他两种策略分别高出16.74％和8.56％，同时所建议的控制方法至少可节能5％。实验结果表明，这三种策略都可以实现对室温的实时控制，而所提出的策略具有更好的稳定性，且设定点复位次数最少。阻尼器位置的平均值比其他两种策略分别高出16.74％和8.56％，同时所建议的控制方法至少可节能5％。实验结果表明，这三种策略都可以实现对室温的实时控制，而所提出的策略具有更好的稳定性，且设定点复位次数最少。阻尼器位置的平均值比其他两种策略分别高出16.74％和8.56％，同时所建议的控制方法至少可节能5％。