ABSTRACT While most wildlife researchers and managers agree that human tolerance is critical in determining the success and persistence of wildlife populations, the concept of tolerance has lacked definitional precision and operational consistency in the literature. This inconsistency has opened the door to a multiplicity of human-wildlife tolerance studies that present tolerance as either an attitude, a normative belief, or a behavioral intention, making it difficult to compare results across study systems. We drew upon foundational human dimensions of wildlife, sociology, and animal behavior studies to propose an integrated framework of human-wildlife tolerance, defined here as “accepting wildlife and/or wildlife behaviors that one dislikes.” This definition clarifies the term “tolerance” by incorporating attitudes and acceptability (antecedents of behavior) as two distinct but interrelated axes. We also develop a typology framework that will provide insight into changing responses to human-wildlife conflict, and help evaluate future tolerance-boosting policy or educational interventions.

中文翻译：

---

超越容忍/不容忍二分法：将态度和可接受性纳入野生动物社会容忍的稳健定义

摘要 虽然大多数野生动物研究人员和管理人员都同意人类的宽容对于决定野生动物种群的成功和持久性至关重要，但宽容的概念在文献中缺乏定义的精确性和操作的一致性。这种不一致为人类-野生动物耐受性研究的多样性打开了大门，这些研究将耐受性表现为一种态度、一种规范信念或一种行为意图，使得跨研究系统比较结果变得困难。我们利用野生动物、社会学和动物行为研究的基本人类维度，提出了一个人类-野生动物容忍的综合框架，这里定义为“接受一个人不喜欢的野生动物和/或野生动物行为。” 该定义通过将态度和可接受性（行为的前因）作为两个不同但相互关联的轴来澄清“容忍”一词。我们还开发了一个类型学框架，该框架将提供对人类与野生动物冲突不断变化的反应的洞察，并帮助评估未来的宽容政策或教育干预措施。