An accurate detector performance evaluation method provides a fair comparison platform and can also support in parameter optimization for existing Impulse noise detectors in the applications of medical imaging. The Impulse noise detector performance measure (INDPM) package is widely applied as tools for quantitative comparison among detectors, which contains recall measure, accuracy measure, precision measure, specificity measure and F-measure. However, these five measures suffer from limited accuracy in correctly evaluating the performance of a detector and are not in well agreement with human subjective evaluation. To solve this problem, five new measures are proposed by introducing a new concept of intensity volume to form a new Impulse noise detector performance package (IV-INDPM). Using a standard image dataset, we conduct experimental and comparative tests with 32 different original images and 5 different existing detectors. Results demonstrate the superior performance of each new measure within IV-INDPM in reaching a much closer agreement with human subjective evaluation, compared to existing measures in INDPM. Even though five new measures are efficient in evaluating detectors’ performance from different perspectives, a new benchmark algorithm (IND-BA) is proposed as a robust and overall metric for ease of general-purpose use by making the most of these five new measures. Comparison results demonstrate its efficiency and accuracy.

准确的检测器性能评估方法提供了一个公平的比较平台，还可以支持医学成像应用中现有的脉冲噪声检测器的参数优化。脉冲噪声检测器性能度量（INDPM）软件包广泛用作检测器之间定量比较的工具，其中包括召回度量，准确性度量，精度度量，特异性度量和F度量。但是，这五种措施在正确评估检测器性能方面的准确性有限，并且与人的主观评估不一致。为了解决这个问题，通过引入强度量的新概念以形成新的脉冲噪声检测器性能包（IV-INDPM），提出了五项新措施。使用标准图像数据集，我们使用32种不同的原始图像和5种不同的现有检测器进行实验和比较测试。结果表明，与INDPM中的现有措施相比，IV-INDPM中的每项新措施在与人的主观评估达成更紧密一致的方面均具有出色的性能。尽管有五种新措施可以有效地从不同角度评估检测器的性能，但还是要通过充分利用这五种新措施，提出一种新的基准算法（IND-BA）作为一种健壮的整体度量标准，以简化通用用途。比较结果证明了其效率和准确性。结果表明，与INDPM中的现有措施相比，IV-INDPM中的每项新措施在与人的主观评估达成更紧密一致的方面均具有出色的性能。尽管有五种新措施可以有效地从不同角度评估检测器的性能，但还是要通过充分利用这五种新措施，提出一种新的基准算法（IND-BA）作为一种健壮的整体度量标准，以简化通用用途。比较结果证明了其效率和准确性。结果表明，与INDPM中的现有措施相比，IV-INDPM中的每项新措施在与人的主观评估达成更紧密一致的方面均具有出色的性能。尽管有五种新措施可以有效地从不同角度评估检测器的性能，但还是要充分利用这五种新措施，提出一种新的基准算法（IND-BA）作为一种健壮的整体度量标准，以简化通用用途。比较结果证明了其效率和准确性。