当前位置: X-MOL 学术WIREs Clim. Chang. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Clouded skies: How digital technologies could reshape “Loss and Damage” from climate change
WIREs Climate Change ( IF 9.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-23 , DOI: 10.1002/wcc.650
Giovanni Bettini 1 , Giovanna Gioli 2 , Romain Felli 3
Affiliation  

As dangerous climate change becomes more and more likely, a consensus has been reached on the importance of addressing Loss and Damage (L&D) residual to mitigation (i.e., preventing climate change) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting in order to avert adverse impacts). In spite of sharp divisions in terms of how to understand and operationalize L&D, most approaches draw on classic environmental governance, with discrete analogic interventions implemented by States and international actors. L&D is mainly envisioned as an “international court of climate justice” that identifies the culprits (emitters), quantifies harm, and compensates victims. While digital technologies and algorithmic governance have colonized many germane policy fields and virtually all economic sectors, in the L&D field a substantive discussion on the use of information and communication technologies, algorithms, and user‐generated data has been conspicuously absent. By taking the prospect of a “digitalization” of L&D seriously, this advanced review identifies the seeds of emerging digitalized approaches to L&D through an overview of literature. We focus on examples in three key domains associated with L&D—insurance, disaster responses and risk management, and human displacement. These empirical cases are used to investigate the modes of governance that accompany the digital tools through which L&D could be implemented, and the profound changes in climate politics and justice that would accompany a digitalization/algorithmization of L&D.

中文翻译:

乌云密布:数字技术如何因气候变化重塑“损失与破坏”

随着危险性气候变化的可能性越来越大,已达成共识,应对缓解(即防止气候变化)和适应(即为了避免不利影响而进行调整)所产生的损失和损害(L&D)的重要性。尽管在如何理解和实施L&D方面存在分歧,但大多数方法还是借鉴了经典的环境治理,并由国家和国际参与者实施了类似的干预措施。L&D主要被设想为“国际气候正义法院”,用于确定罪魁祸首(排放者),量化危害并赔偿受害者。尽管数字技术和算法治理已经在许多德国政策领域和几乎所有经济领域中占据了统治地位,但在L&显然,关于信息和通信技术,算法和用户生成的数据的使用缺乏实质性讨论。通过认真对待L&D的“数字化”前景,这篇高级综述通过文献综述确定了新兴的L&D数字化方法的种子。我们重点研究与L&D相关的三个关键领域中的示例:保险,灾难响应和风险管理以及人员流离失所。这些经验案例用于调查可通过其实施L&D的数字工具的治理模式,以及将伴随L&D的数字化/算法化的气候政治和正义的深刻变化。通过认真对待L&D的“数字化”前景,这篇高级综述通过文献综述确定了新兴的L&D数字化方法的种子。我们重点研究与L&D相关的三个关键领域中的示例:保险,灾难响应和风险管理以及人员流离失所。这些经验案例用于调查可通过其实施L&D的数字工具的治理模式,以及将伴随L&D的数字化/算法化的气候政治和正义的深刻变化。通过认真对待L&D的“数字化”前景,这篇高级综述通过文献综述确定了新兴的L&D数字化方法的种子。我们重点研究与L&D相关的三个关键领域中的示例:保险,灾难响应和风险管理以及人员流离失所。这些经验案例用于调查可通过其实施L&D的数字工具的治理模式,以及将伴随L&D的数字化/算法化的气候政治和正义的深刻变化。D-保险,灾害应对和风险管理以及人员流离失所。这些经验案例用于调查可通过其实施L&D的数字工具的治理模式,以及将伴随L&D的数字化/算法化的气候政治和正义的深刻变化。D-保险,灾害应对和风险管理以及人员流离失所。这些经验案例用于调查可通过其实施L&D的数字工具的治理模式,以及将伴随L&D的数字化/算法化的气候政治和正义的深刻变化。
更新日期:2020-04-23
down
wechat
bug