Participants with ADHD (n = 45) and participants without ADHD (n = 130, total n = 175) judged hypothetical moral and conventional rule violations that varied the impulsivity of the act, the ADHD diagnosis, and the gender of the actor in order to examine (1) social reasoning about impulsiveness and (2) whether participants infer impulsiveness from the characteristics of the actor, including gender and ADHD-status. Moral violations were judged more negatively than conventional violations, even when they were impulsive. The characteristics of the actor influenced judgments in that participants judged boys' behavior as more acceptable, as having less control, and as deserving of less punishment compared to girls. In addition, actors who were described as having ADHD were judged overall more positively. Participants with ADHD judged that all actors should receive similar punishment, regardless of the actor's ADHD diagnosis, while participants without ADHD judged actors with ADHD should receive less punishment than those without.

中文翻译：

---

多动症和违反规则的冲动判断。

患有多动症的参与者（n = 45）和没有多动症的参与者（n = 130，总计n = 175）对假想的道德和常规规则违反行为进行了判断，这些行为违反了行为的冲动性，ADHD诊断和演员的性别，从而检查（1）关于冲动的社会推理，以及（2）参与者是否从演员的特征（包括性别和ADHD状态）推断出冲动。与常规违规相比，道德违规被判定为负面的，即使是冲动的。演员的特征影响了判断，因为与女孩相比，参与者认为男孩的行为更容易接受，控制较少，应受的惩罚更少。此外，总体而言，被描述为患有多动症的演员的评分更高。