The current review sought to describe the published literature relative to addressing trauma in schools. Through a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications as well as gray literature, we identified a total of 91 publications that were coded for study rigor as well as a number of intervention characteristics. Publications included in the review mentioned a variety of intervention components, most notably an emphasis on counseling services, skill development, psychoeducation related to trauma, and parent engagement. We identified a relative lack of empirical evaluation of whole-school approaches and interventions intended to be delivered by non-clinical staff. We also found that less rigorous publications were more likely to highlight the needs of particularly vulnerable groups of youth and to emphasize cultural competence and community engagement in efforts to address trauma in schools. We call for more rigorous evaluation of practices and policies that take a whole-school approach and can be implemented by non-clinical staff. In particular, we highlight the need to evaluate professional development strategies that can help school staff acquire knowledge and skills that can translate into improved outcomes for students—especially students from historically marginalized groups. We also emphasize the importance of ensuring that high-quality research be made accessible to policymakers and school staff to ensure that clear, evidence-based guidance is available to avoid programs, practices, and policies that may inadvertently traumatize students or exacerbate symptoms among students who have already experienced trauma.

中文翻译：

---

为支持经历过创伤的学生而开展的基于学校的努力的范围回顾

当前的审查试图描述与解决学校创伤有关的已发表文献。通过对经过同行评审的出版物以及灰色文献的系统评价，我们确定了总共91篇经过严格研究和干预特征编码的出版物。评价中包括的出版物提到了多种干预成分，其中最着重的是对咨询服务，技能开发，与创伤有关的心理教育以及父母的参与度的重视。我们发现相对缺乏对非临床人员打算采用的全校方法和干预措施的实证评估。我们还发现，不那么严格的出版物更有可能强调特别易受伤害的青年群体的需求，并强调文化能力和社区参与以解决学校创伤的努力。我们呼吁对采用全校方法并且可以由非临床人员实施的做法和政策进行更严格的评估。特别是，我们强调需要评估专业发展策略，以帮助学校工作人员获得知识和技能，这些知识和技能可以为学生，尤其是处于历史边缘的群体的学生带来更好的学习成果。我们还强调，必须确保决策者和学校工作人员可以进行高质量的研究，以确保可获得清晰，循证的指南，以避免方案，做法，