Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Study That Made Rats Jump for Joy, and Then Killed Them: The Gap between Knowledge and Practice Widens When Scientists Fail to Engage with the Ethical Implications of Their Own Work.
BioEssays ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-01 , DOI: 10.1002/bies.202000030 Christine E Webb 1 , Peter Woodford 2 , Elise Huchard 3
BioEssays ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-01 , DOI: 10.1002/bies.202000030 Christine E Webb 1 , Peter Woodford 2 , Elise Huchard 3
Affiliation
Much contemporary behavioral science stops short of considering the ethical implications of its own findings. This generates a contradiction between methods and discoveries, and hinders translation between updated scientific evidence for animal sentience and corresponding political and legal changes. A recent and particularly illustrative example in rodents is described here.
中文翻译:
让老鼠为之欢欣鼓舞,然后杀死它们的研究:当科学家未能参与到他们自己工作的伦理意义时,知识与实践之间的差距就会扩大。
许多当代行为科学没有考虑其自身发现的伦理影响。这在方法和发现之间产生了矛盾,并阻碍了动物感知的最新科学证据与相应的政治和法律变化之间的转化。此处描述了啮齿类动物中最近的一个特别说明性的例子。
更新日期:2020-04-01
中文翻译:
让老鼠为之欢欣鼓舞,然后杀死它们的研究:当科学家未能参与到他们自己工作的伦理意义时,知识与实践之间的差距就会扩大。
许多当代行为科学没有考虑其自身发现的伦理影响。这在方法和发现之间产生了矛盾,并阻碍了动物感知的最新科学证据与相应的政治和法律变化之间的转化。此处描述了啮齿类动物中最近的一个特别说明性的例子。