当前位置: X-MOL 学术Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Scientific Publication in Russia: Why and How?
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences ( IF 0.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-01 , DOI: 10.1134/s1019331620010050
M. M. Gorbunov-Posadov

Abstract The modern scientific community somewhat forgets the original meaning of the word publication (from Latin publico , I declare publicly): publicizing. Questionable administrative restrictions lead to the fact that expansion of readership is an author’s almost last concern. This article considers characteristic examples of the unjustified narrowing of readership imposed on the author. In particular, authors are forced to take their articles to journals indexed in the Web of Science, and most of these journals never fall into open access; i.e., they are inaccessible to the general reader. As a result, leading Russian journals not included into privileged bibliographic databases find themselves in extremely unfavorable conditions. The relevance of scientific monographs is generally questioned. The use of available anti-plagiarism software, which is binding today, often leads to anecdotal effects. Administrative barriers slow down the introduction of progressive forms of online publishing. Among Russian scientific journals, only a few allow online corrections noticed by authors. “Alive” publications—texts updated by authors to reflect the latest results and the current state of affairs in the science field under consideration—are exceptionally rare in Russia. Just two or three Russian journals have responded to the global trend of PDF-to-HTML evolution, although this evolution opens up an unlimited scope for the improvement of online scientific publishing tools.

中文翻译:

俄罗斯的科学出版物:为什么和如何?

摘要 现代科学界有些忘记了publication这个词的本义(来自拉丁语publico,我公开声明):publicizing。有问题的行政限制导致这样一个事实,即扩大读者群是作者几乎最后关心的问题。本文考虑了强加给作者的不合理的读者范围缩小的典型例子。特别是,作者被迫将他们的文章带到 Web of Science 索引的期刊上,而这些期刊中的大多数从未进入开放获取;即,一般读者无法访问它们。结果,未被列入特权书目数据库的主要俄罗斯期刊发现自己处于极其不利的境地。科学专着的相关性普遍受到质疑。使用现有的反抄袭软件,这在今天具有约束力,通常会导致轶事效应。行政障碍减缓了在线出版进步形式的引入。在俄罗斯科学期刊中,只有少数允许作者注意到的在线更正。“活着”的出版物——作者更新的文本以反映所考虑的科学领域的最新结果和现状——在俄罗斯极为罕见。只有两三个俄罗斯期刊响应了 PDF 到 HTML 演变的全球趋势,尽管这种演变为在线科学出版工具的改进开辟了无限的空间。只有少数允许作者注意到的在线更正。“活着”的出版物——作者更新的文本以反映所考虑的科学领域的最新结果和现状——在俄罗斯极为罕见。只有两三个俄罗斯期刊响应了 PDF 到 HTML 演变的全球趋势,尽管这种演变为在线科学出版工具的改进开辟了无限的空间。只有少数允许作者注意到的在线更正。“活着”的出版物——作者更新的文本以反映所考虑的科学领域的最新结果和现状——在俄罗斯极为罕见。只有两三个俄罗斯期刊响应了 PDF 到 HTML 演变的全球趋势,尽管这种演变为在线科学出版工具的改进开辟了无限的空间。
更新日期:2020-01-01
down
wechat
bug