当前位置: X-MOL 学术Food Policy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Are aquaculture growth policies in high-income countries due diligence or illusionary dreams? Foreseeing policy implications on seafood production in Singapore
Food Policy ( IF 6.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101885
Florence Alexia Bohnes , U-Primo Rodriguez , Max Nielsen , Alexis Laurent

Abstract In the beginning of 2019, the Singaporean government announced its desire to increase domestic food production and, in particular, aquaculture to reach 30% of self-sufficiency by 2030. Similar policies aiming at encouraging aquaculture growth abound in high-income countries in recent years, but have had limited success. Hence, this paper investigates the potential implications of such policies to foresee consequences beforehand and improve the policy’s chances of success. Three scenarios of aquaculture development are built for Singapore until 2040, among which a business-as-usual scenario and two explorative scenarios aiming at increasing aquaculture production, the first emphasizing existing technologies and the second giving priority to novel and innovative ones, like recirculating aquaculture systems. These scenarios are assessed using an adapted version of the supply-demand partial equilibrium model Asiafish to challenge their viability in the socioeconomic context of Singapore. Only the two explorative scenarios are found to allow the Singaporean government to reach its goal in terms of seafood self-sufficiency by 2030, one of which appears to have strong advantages. In this scenario, imports decrease by 28% by 2040, seafood self-sufficiency reaches 69% and 90% of all aquaculture originates from innovative technologies, which would make Singapore an aquaculture tech-hub. It also has higher benefits within Singapore environmental, social and economic constraints such as land and aquafeed scarcity.

中文翻译:

高收入国家的水产养殖增长政策是尽职调查还是幻想?预见对新加坡海产品生产的政策影响

摘要 2019 年初,新加坡政府宣布希望增加国内粮食产量,特别是水产养殖,到 2030 年达到自给率的 30%。近年来,旨在鼓励水产养殖增长的类似政策在高收入国家比比皆是。年,但收效甚微。因此,本文调查了此类政策的潜在影响,以提前预见后果并提高政策成功的机会。为新加坡到 2040 年构建了三个水产养殖发展情景,其中一个照常经营情景和两个旨在增加水产养殖产量的探索性情景,第一个强调现有技术,第二个优先考虑创新和创新技术,如循环水产养殖系统。这些情景是使用供需部分平衡模型亚洲鱼的改编版本进行评估的,以挑战它们在新加坡社会经济背景下的生存能力。只有这两种探索性情景才能让新加坡政府在 2030 年实现海产品自给自足的目标,其中之一似乎具有很强的优势。在这种情况下,到 2040 年进口将减少 28%,海产品自给率达到 69%,所有水产养殖的 90% 来自创新技术,这将使新加坡成为水产养殖技术中心。在新加坡的环境、社会和经济限制(例如土地和水产饲料稀缺)中,它还具有更高的效益。只有这两种探索性情景才能让新加坡政府在 2030 年实现海产品自给自足的目标,其中之一似乎具有很强的优势。在这种情况下,到 2040 年进口将减少 28%,海产品自给率达到 69%,所有水产养殖的 90% 来自创新技术,这将使新加坡成为水产养殖技术中心。在新加坡的环境、社会和经济限制(例如土地和水产饲料稀缺)中,它还具有更高的效益。只有这两种探索性情景才能让新加坡政府在 2030 年实现海产品自给自足的目标,其中之一似乎具有很强的优势。在这种情况下,到 2040 年进口将减少 28%,海产品自给率达到 69%,所有水产养殖的 90% 来自创新技术,这将使新加坡成为水产养殖技术中心。在新加坡的环境、社会和经济限制(例如土地和水产饲料稀缺)中,它还具有更高的效益。海鲜自给率达到 69%,所有水产养殖的 90% 都源自创新技术,这将使新加坡成为水产养殖技术中心。在新加坡的环境、社会和经济限制(例如土地和水产饲料稀缺)中,它还具有更高的效益。海鲜自给率达到 69%,所有水产养殖的 90% 都源自创新技术,这将使新加坡成为水产养殖技术中心。在新加坡的环境、社会和经济限制(例如土地和水产饲料稀缺)中,它还具有更高的效益。
更新日期:2020-05-01
down
wechat
bug