当前位置: X-MOL 学术APMIS › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Evaluation of a semi-automated Seegene PCR workflow with MTB, MDR, and NTM detection for rapid screening of tuberculosis in a low-prevalence setting.
APMIS ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-23 , DOI: 10.1111/apm.13040
Bruno Vincent Luukinen 1, 2 , Risto Vuento 1 , Jari Juhani Hirvonen 1, 3
Affiliation  

In areas of low tuberculosis (TB) prevalence, laboratory diagnosis of TB may essentially cover non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in addition to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). In this study, a semi-automated PCR workflow distinguishing MTB and NTM (Anyplex™ MTB/NTMe, Seegene) and subsequently detecting MTB isoniazid/rifampicin resistance (Allplex™ MTB/MDRe, Seegene) was evaluated for replacing smear microscopy of acid-fast bacilli as the rapid screening method for TB. With 279 clinical samples, 47 cultures positive for MTB and 76 for NTM, the Anyplex™ MTB/NTMe assay and smear microscopy showed equal sensitivities (49.6% vs 50.8%, respectively) but Anyplex™ MTB/NTMe was more sensitive for MTB (63.8% vs 25.6%) than for NTM (40.8% vs 64.5%). Allplex™ MTB/MDRe showed a slightly higher sensitivity of 68.1% for MTB (32/47 positive, n = 222). Antibiotic resistance profiles were correctly identified for all MTB isolates (one MDR isolate). Specificity was 100% for both assays. Anyplex™ MTB/NTMe detected all the 18 NTM species present in the study. The analytical performance of the evaluated high-throughput workflow was relatively weak compared to culture but potentially adequate as a rapid screening method analogous to smear microscopy with additional differentiation between TB, MDR-TB, and NTM.

中文翻译:

评估具有MTB,MDR和NTM检测的半自动化Seegene PCR工作流程,以在低患病情况下快速筛查结核病。

在结核病低发地区,除结核分枝杆菌(MTB)以外,结核病的实验室诊断可能基本上涵盖了非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)。在这项研究中,评估了区分MTB和NTM(Anyplex™MTB / NTMe,Seegene)并随后检测MTB异烟肼/利福平耐药性(Allplex™MTB / MDRe,Seegene)的半自动化PCR工作流程,以替代耐酸涂片显微镜细菌作为结核病的快速筛查方法。Anyplex™MTB / NTMe检测和涂片显微镜检查共279种临床样品,47种MTB阳性培养物和76种NTM阳性培养物,其敏感性相同(分别为49.6%和50.8%),但Anyplex™MTB / NTMe对MTB更为敏感(63.8 %对比25.6%)比NTM(40.8%对比64.5%)。Allplex™MTB / MDRe对MTB的敏感性略高,为68.1%(32/47阳性,n = 222)。正确鉴定了所有MTB分离株(一种MDR分离株)的抗生素耐药性。两种测定的特异性均为100%。Anyplex™MTB / NTMe检测到研究中存在的所有18种NTM物种。与培养相比,评估的高通量工作流程的分析性能相对较弱,但作为类似于涂片显微镜的快速筛选方法(在TB,MDR-TB和NTM之间有额外的区别),可能足够。
更新日期:2020-03-23
down
wechat
bug