Climate engineering (CE) is often said to bring about significant opportunities as well as risks. The pursuit of CE measures can be framed as either responsible or irresponsible, resulting in contentious and ambiguous communication. This article starts out from a notion of responsibility regarding subjects, objects, norms, and authorities. It will identify and analyze discursive patterns of responsibility across six expert arenas and provide a comparative mapping of these patterns. Better understanding controversy may help in finding common ground for designing research and policy strategies around CE. Taking on the challenges of communicating CE-related responsibilities would support CE governance.

中文翻译：

---

气候工程作为一种交流挑战：跨科学和政策专家领域的有争议的责任概念

人们常说气候工程 (CE) 会带来重大机遇和风险。对 CE 措施的追求可以被定义为负责任或不负责任，从而导致有争议和模棱两可的沟通。本文从关于主体、客体、规范和权威的责任概念开始。它将识别和分析六个专家领域的责任话语模式，并提供这些模式的比较映射。更好地理解争议可能有助于找到围绕 CE 设计研究和政策策略的共同点。应对传达 CE 相关责任的挑战将支持 CE 治理。