当前位置: X-MOL 学术Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Balancing land sharing and sparing approaches to promote forest and landscape restoration in agricultural landscapes: Land approaches for forest landscape restoration
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation ( IF 4.0 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-13 , DOI: 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.09.002
Paula Meli , José María Rey-Benayas , Pedro H.S. Brancalion

Forest and landscape restoration (FLR) could benefit from the land sharing/sparing approaches to support decisions. We discuss four questions potentially shaping FLR outcomes in agricultural landscapes in the context of land sharing/sparing decisions: (1) Which are the main focuses of restorative interventions?; (2) Which kind of restored forests should these interventions target?; (3) Which restorative interventions should be implemented and where?; and (4) What are the major factors influencing restoration outcomes? Some restorative interventions embraced by FLR may compete with specific land uses and thus require careful planning to minimize trade-offs and maximize synergies. Decision making on the restorative intervention combination needs considering the spatial distribution and configuration of the final land uses in the landscape together with its social context and a multi-stakeholder process. Ultimately, finding the right balance between land sharing/sparing approaches will also require navigating governance issues that regulate FLR implementation.



中文翻译:

平衡土地共享和节约方法,以促进农业景观中的森林和景观恢复:土地方法用于森林景观恢复

森林和景观恢复(FLR)可以受益于土地共享/保留方法来支持决策。我们讨论了在土地共享/保留决策的背景下可能影响农业景观中FLR结果的四个问题:(1)恢复性干预措施的主要重点是什么?(2)这些干预措施应针对哪种恢复森林?(3)应该在哪些地方实施恢复性干预措施?(4)影响修复结果的主要因素是什么?FLR所采用的一些恢复性干预措施可能会与特定的土地用途竞争,因此需要进行仔细的规划以最小化取舍和最大化协同作用。有关恢复性干预措施组合的决策需要考虑景观中最终土地用途的空间分布和配置,以及其社会背景和多方利益相关者过程。最终,要在土地共享/节约方式之间找到适当的平衡,还需要解决规范FLR实施的治理问题。

更新日期:2019-11-13
down
wechat
bug