Abstract How to minimize socio-economic costs placed on local fishing communities by marine reserves is a widespread concern in the global conservation planning practices. One prevailing solution is to generate cost-minimizing marine conservation strategies using static spatial prioritization tools. However, there is a need to understand the social-ecological impacts of considering dynamics. We applied a grid-based dynamic model with biological and fleet sub-models, and examined the social-ecological effects of three cost-minimizing conservation strategies over a 20-year planning horizon (medium term), incorporating dynamics in fish populations and fisher behaviors, and associated uncertainties. This study shows a trade-off among cost minimization conservation strategies between conservation and socio-economic benefits. Estimated opportunity costs were different between static and dynamic methods, highlighting the necessity to include dynamic costs as an extra source in decision-making. We caution that relying solely on opportunity costs as the criterion to guide conservation practices can be misleading as it may fail to reflect overarching social-ecological objectives. The study contributes to a further understanding of prevailing strategies' potentials and limitations, and equips practitioners with a dynamic perspective to choose the best conservation strategy.

中文翻译：

---

从动态角度重新思考海洋保护战略，以最大限度地减少社会经济成本

摘要 如何最大限度地减少海洋保护区给当地渔业社区带来的社会经济成本是全球保护规划实践中广泛关注的问题。一种流行的解决方案是使用静态空间优先排序工具制定成本最小化的海洋保护策略。然而，有必要了解考虑动态的社会生态影响。我们应用了基于网格的动态模型和生物和船队子模型，并在 20 年规划范围内（中期）检查了三种成本最小化保护策略的社会生态影响，并结合了鱼类种群和渔民行为的动态，以及相关的不确定性。这项研究显示了保护和社会经济效益之间成本最小化保护策略之间的权衡。静态方法和动态方法之间的估计机会成本不同，突出了将动态成本作为额外来源纳入决策的必要性。我们警告说，仅仅依靠机会成本作为指导保护实践的标准可能会产生误导，因为它可能无法反映总体社会生态目标。该研究有助于进一步了解现行策略的潜力和局限性，并为从业者提供选择最佳保护策略的动态视角。我们警告说，仅仅依靠机会成本作为指导保护实践的标准可能会产生误导，因为它可能无法反映总体社会生态目标。该研究有助于进一步了解现行策略的潜力和局限性，并为从业者提供选择最佳保护策略的动态视角。我们警告说，仅仅依靠机会成本作为指导保护实践的标准可能会产生误导，因为它可能无法反映总体社会生态目标。该研究有助于进一步了解现行策略的潜力和局限性，并为从业者提供选择最佳保护策略的动态视角。