当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Psychiatr. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological interventions for the treatment and prevention of delirium: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Journal of Psychiatric Research ( IF 4.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-27 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.03.012
Min Seo Kim 1 , Hye Chang Rhim 1 , Ariel Park 2 , Hanna Kim 3 , Kyu-Man Han 4 , Ashwin A Patkar 5 , Chi-Un Pae 6 , Changsu Han 4
Affiliation  

We performed a network meta-analysis to build clear hierarchies of efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for the treatment and prevention of delirium. Electronic databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE were searched published up to February 22, 2019. A total of 108 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pharmacotherapy on delirium were included for analysis, and the strength of evidence (SoE) was evaluated for critical outcomes. In terms of treatment, quetiapine (low SoE), morphine (low SoE), and dexmedetomidine (moderate SoE) were effective in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In terms of prevention, dexmedetomidine (high SoE) and risperidone (high SoE) significantly reduced the incidence of delirium in ICU surgical patients, while ramelteon (high SoE) reduced the incidence of delirium in ICU medical patients. Despite the efficacy, dexmedetomidine and risperidone demonstrated higher drop-out rate (moderate to high SoE). Haloperidol and other antipsychotics, except for quetiapine and risperidone, showed no benefit. None of the agents showed benefit in non-ICU patients. In conclusion, dexmedetomidine may be a drug of choice for both treating and preventing delirium of the ICU and postsurgical patients. However, it may be less tolerable, and side-effects should be adequately managed. Current evidence does not support the routine use of antipsychotics. For medical patients, oral ramelteon might be useful for prevention.

中文翻译:

药物治疗for妄的比较功效和可接受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

我们进行了网络荟萃分析,以建立清晰的治疗和预防of妄的药理学干预措施的功效和耐受性等级。检索截至2019年2月22日已发布的电子数据库,包括PubMed,Google Scholar,Embase,Cochrane对照试验中央注册,PsycINFO和MEDLINE。共纳入108项研究del妄药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT),以进行分析,并评估了证据强度(SoE)以评估关键结果。在治疗方面,喹硫平(低SoE),吗啡(低SoE)和右美托咪定(中度SoE)在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中有效。在预防方面,右美托咪定(高SoE)和利培酮(高SoE)可显着降低ICU手术患者的patients妄发生率,而雷梅替尼(高SoE)可以降低ICU内科患者patients妄的发生率。尽管有疗效,右美托咪定和利培酮显示出较高的辍学率(中等至高SoE)。除喹硫平和利培酮外,氟哌啶醇和其他抗精神病药均无益处。没有一种药物在非ICU患者中显示出益处。总之,右美托咪定可能是治疗和预防ICU和术后患者del妄的一种选择药物。但是,它的耐受性可能较低,并且副作用应得到适当管理。当前证据不支持常规使用抗精神病药。对于医学患者,口服雷梅替尼可能有助于预防。右美托咪定和利培酮显示出较高的辍学率(中等至高SoE)。除喹硫平和利培酮外,氟哌啶醇和其他抗精神病药均无益处。没有一种药物在非ICU患者中显示出益处。总之,右美托咪定可能是治疗和预防ICU和术后患者del妄的一种选择药物。但是,它的耐受性可能较低,并且副作用应得到适当管理。当前证据不支持常规使用抗精神病药。对于医学患者,口服雷梅替尼可能有助于预防。右美托咪定和利培酮显示出较高的辍学率(中等至高SoE)。除喹硫平和利培酮外,氟哌啶醇和其他抗精神病药均无益处。没有一种药物在非ICU患者中显示出益处。总之,右美托咪定可能是治疗和预防ICU和术后患者del妄的一种选择药物。但是,它的耐受性可能较低,并且副作用应得到适当处理。当前证据不支持常规使用抗精神病药。对于医学患者,口服雷梅替尼可能有助于预防。右美托咪定可能是治疗和预防ICU和术后患者del妄的药物。但是,它的耐受性可能较低,并且副作用应得到适当管理。当前证据不支持常规使用抗精神病药。对于医学患者,口服雷梅替尼可能有助于预防。右美托咪定可能是治疗和预防ICU和术后患者del妄的选择药物。但是,它的耐受性可能较低,并且副作用应得到适当管理。当前证据不支持常规使用抗精神病药。对于医学患者,口服雷梅替尼可能有助于预防。
更新日期:2020-03-27
down
wechat
bug