当前位置: X-MOL 学术Bone Marrow Transpl. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Myeloablative conditioning for allo-HSCT in pediatric ALL: FTBI or chemotherapy?-A multicenter EBMT-PDWP study.
Bone Marrow Transplantation ( IF 4.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-17 , DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-0854-0
Andre Manfred Willasch 1 , Christina Peters 2 , Petr Sedláček 3 , Jean-Hugues Dalle 4 , Vassiliki Kitra-Roussou 5 , Akif Yesilipek 6 , Jacek Wachowiak 7 , Arjan Lankester 8 , Arcangelo Prete 9 , Amir Ali Hamidieh 10 , Marianne Ifversen 11 , Jochen Buechner 12 , Gergely Kriván 13 , Rose-Marie Hamladji 14 , Cristina Diaz-de-Heredia 15 , Elena Skorobogatova 16 , Gérard Michel 17 , Franco Locatelli 18, 19 , Alice Bertaina 18, 19, 20 , Paul Veys 21 , Sophie Dupont 22 , Reuven Or 23 , Tayfun Güngör 24 , Olga Aleinikova 25 , Sabina Sufliarska 26 , Mikael Sundin 27 , Jelena Rascon 28 , Ain Kaare 29 , Damir Nemet 30 , Franca Fagioli 31 , Thomas Erich Klingebiel 1 , Jan Styczynski 32 , Marc Bierings 33 , Kálmán Nagy 34 , Manuel Abecasis 35 , Boris Afanasyev 36 , Marc Ansari 37 , Kim Vettenranta 38 , Amal Alseraihy 39 , Alicja Chybicka 40 , Stephen Robinson 41 , Yves Bertrand 42 , Alphan Kupesiz 43 , Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh 44 , Antonio Campos 45 , Herbert Pichler 2 , Arnaud Dalissier 46 , Myriam Labopin 47 , Selim Corbacioglu 48 , Adriana Balduzzi 49 , Jacques-Emmanuel Galimard 46 , Peter Bader 1 ,
Affiliation  

Although most children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receive fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) as myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), it is an important matter of debate if chemotherapy can effectively replace FTBI. To compare outcomes after FTBI versus chemotherapy-based conditioning (CC), we performed a retrospective EBMT registry study. Children aged 2–18 years after MAC for first allo-HSCT of bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from matched-related (MRD) or unrelated donors (UD) in first (CR1) or second remission (CR2) between 2000 and 2012 were included. Propensity score weighting was used to control pretreatment imbalances of the observed variables. 3.054 patients were analyzed. CR1 (1.498): median follow-up (FU) after FTBI (1.285) and CC (213) was 6.8 and 6.1 years. Survivals were not significantly different. CR2 (1.556): median FU after FTBI (1.345) and CC (211) was 6.2 years. Outcomes after FTBI were superior as compared with CC with regard to overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse incidence (RI), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). However, we must emphasize the preliminary character of the results of this retrospective “real-world-practice” study. These findings will be prospectively assessed in the ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM trial.



中文翻译:

儿科 ALL 中异基因 HSCT 的清髓调理:FTBI 还是化疗? - 一项多中心 EBMT-PDWP 研究。

尽管大多数急性淋巴细胞白血病 (ALL) 儿童接受分次全身照射 (FTBI) 作为同种异体造血干细胞移植 (allo-HSCT) 的清髓预处理 (MAC),但化疗能否有效替代 FTBI 仍是一个重要的争论问题。为了比较 FTBI 与基于化疗的调理 (CC) 后的结果,我们进行了一项回顾性 EBMT 注册研究。MAC 后 2-18 岁的儿童在第一次 (CR1) 或第二次缓解 (CR2) 中对来自匹配相关 (MRD) 或无关供体 (UD) 的骨髓 (BM) 或外周血干细胞 (PBSC) 进行首次同种异体 HSCT )2000 年至 2012 年期间的数据也包括在内。倾向评分加权用于控制观察变量的治疗前不平衡。分析了 3.054 名患者。CR1 (1.498):FTBI 后中位随访 (FU) (1. 285)和CC(213)分别为6.8和6.1年。生存率没有显着差异。CR2 (1.556):FTBI (1.345) 和 CC (211) 后的中位 FU 为 6.2 年。与 CC 相比,FTBI 后的结果在总生存期 (OS)、无白血病生存期 (LFS)、复发率 (RI) 和非复发死亡率 (NRM) 方面均优于 CC。然而,我们必须强调这项回顾性“现实世界实践”研究结果的初步特征。这些发现将在 ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM 试验中进行前瞻性评估。我们必须强调这项回顾性“现实世界实践”研究结果的初步特征。这些发现将在 ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM 试验中进行前瞻性评估。我们必须强调这项回顾性“现实世界实践”研究结果的初步特征。这些发现将在 ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM 试验中进行前瞻性评估。

更新日期:2020-04-24
down
wechat
bug