当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Incorporating biophilic criteria into green building rating tools: Case study of Green Mark and LEED
Environmental Impact Assessment Review ( IF 9.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106380
Boya Jiang , Yifan Song , Hong Xian Li , Stephen Siu-Yu Lau , Qinghua Lei

Abstract The integration of health and well-being into green building rating tools (GBRTs) has been increasingly advocated in recent years, moving beyond an energy efficiency focus. The proposed research responds to this movement by offering a multi-angle analysis of the process of incorporating biophilic strategies into the GBRTs—the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) V4 for Building Design and Construction, LEED V4 for Neighborhood Development, and Green Mark for Non-Residential Buildings (NRB): 2015. Based on a literature review, 42 categories of biophilic strategies are reformatted and reorganized in this paper. Moreover, four influencing factors are identified in this paper, including climate, policy, hydrology, and geography, which enable a correlative comparison through the categories of landscape, ventilation, interaction, mitigation, sense, and mobility. Based on comprehensive analysis, three findings are identified: (1) the correlations and divergences of biophilic strategies among the GBRTs are scrutinized; (2) policy and climate comprise the key influencing factors with high impacts for GM and LEED BD + C, while policy and geography are key factors for LEED ND, as the GBRTs shift from sustainability to well-being; and (3) corresponding to the identified key factors, suggestions are proposed for the stakeholders to support improvements to facilitate biophilic integration with GM and LEED (BD + C, ND).

中文翻译:

将亲生物标准纳入绿色建筑评级工具:绿色标志和 LEED 的案例研究

摘要 近年来,人们越来越多地提倡将健康和福祉纳入绿色建筑评级工具 (GBRT),而不仅仅是关注能源效率。拟议的研究通过对将亲生物策略纳入 GBRT 的过程进行多角度分析来响应这一运动——能源与环境设计领导力 (LEED) V4 用于建筑设计和施工、LEED V4 用于社区开发和绿色Mark for Non-Residential Buildings (NRB): 2015. 根据文献综述,本文对 42 类亲生物策略进行了重新格式化和重组。此外,本文确定了四个影响因素,包括气候、政策、水文和地理,可以通过景观、通风、互动、缓解、感知和流动性。基于综合分析,确定了三个发现:(1)仔细审查了 GBRT 之间亲生物策略的相关性和差异;(2) 政策和气候是对 GM 和 LEED BD + C 影响较大的关键影响因素,而政策和地理是 LEED ND 的关键因素,因为 GBRT 从可持续性转向福祉;(3) 针对确定的关键因素,向利益相关者提出建议,以支持改进以促进与 GM 和 LEED 的亲生物整合(BD + C,ND)。(2) 政策和气候是对 GM 和 LEED BD + C 影响较大的关键影响因素,而政策和地理是 LEED ND 的关键因素,因为 GBRT 从可持续性转向福祉;(3) 针对确定的关键因素,向利益相关者提出建议,以支持改进以促进与 GM 和 LEED 的亲生物整合(BD + C,ND)。(2) 政策和气候是对 GM 和 LEED BD + C 影响较大的关键影响因素,而政策和地理是 LEED ND 的关键因素,因为 GBRT 从可持续性转向福祉;(3) 针对确定的关键因素,向利益相关者提出建议,以支持改进以促进与 GM 和 LEED 的亲生物整合(BD + C,ND)。
更新日期:2020-05-01
down
wechat
bug