Abstract

Warships are excluded from all international environmental regulations. This study seeks for an answer what the result will be if warships must obey these regulations. The functional unit is described as the total domestic and some of the maintenance wastes of a warship during 1-year period. The wastes consist of 3.3 t of glass, 755.9 t of paper, 875 t of plastic, 76 t of metal. Besides, 4.3 t of other types of wastes. While Scenario1 and Scenario2 accept that all the wastes are sent to landfill and incineration, respectively, Scenario3 and Scenario4 accept that all the recyclable materials are recycled and the rest of them are sent to landfill and incineration. These scenarios were evaluated via SimaPro 8.0.2 LCA program and ReCiPe 2008 Version 1.09 method. It is concluded that Scenario3 has the least impact for human health (0.09 DALY), ecosystems (0.0003 species year) and resources ($ 1124). Scenario2 has the worst values for human health (68 DALY), ecosystems (0.083 species·year) and resources ($ 335,040). The total social cost of emissions is 147,930 € for Scenario3. On the other hand, the cost of Scenario2 is 931,638 €.

中文翻译：

---

从生命周期的角度对军舰废物管理方案进行环境和经济分析

摘要

军舰不受所有国际环境法规的限制。本研究寻求一个答案，如果军舰必须遵守这些规定，将会产生什么结果。功能单元描述为一艘军舰在一年内的总生活垃圾和一些维护浪费。废物包括3.3吨玻璃，755.9吨纸，875吨塑料，76吨金属。此外，还有4.3吨其他类型的废物。方案1和方案2分别接受所有废物被送往垃圾掩埋场和焚化，而方案3和方案4接受所有可回收材料被循环利用，其余的则被送往垃圾掩埋场和焚化。通过SimaPro 8.0.2 LCA程序和ReCiPe 2008版本1.09方法评估了这些方案。结论是，方案3对人类健康的影响最小（0.09 DALY），生态系统（0.0003个物种年）和资源（1124美元）。方案2的人类健康（68天生命年），生态系统（0.083种·年）和资源（335,040美元）的价值最差。方案3的社会排放总成本为147,930欧元。另一方面，Scenario2的费用为931,638欧元。