Individuals with psychosis report employing more maladaptive and less adaptive emotion regulation (ER) strategies compared to nonclinical controls (NCs). However, it is unknown whether this is predictive of affect experienced in daily life and whether ER strategies are used less frequently and effectively by individuals with psychosis in daily life. Individuals with psychosis and current delusions (PDs; n = 71) and NCs (n = 42) completed questionnaires of habitual ER and experience sampling over 6 consecutive days, in which they reported 10 times a day on the presence of negative and positive affect and deployment of ER strategies (reappraisal, acceptance, awareness, suppression, rumination, distraction, and social sharing). Effectiveness of strategy use was operationalized by examining successive differences in positive and negative affect. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted. Questionnaires of habitual ER were largely predictive of affect in daily life. There was indication of a more frequent use of putatively maladaptive strategies but either no differences in individual adaptive strategies or even a more frequent use (reappraisal) in PDs compared to NCs. Several ER strategies (e.g., reappraisal, rumination) proved effective in reducing negative affect by the next prompt, independent of group, but suppression was effective in only PDs and acceptance had unfavorable effects in both groups. Thus, PDs demonstrated an increased use of ER strategies in daily life, of which the majority helped them to reduce negative affect. This indicates that their increased levels of negative affect are not explicable by difficulties in deploying explicit ER strategies. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

情绪调节在患有精神病和非临床控制者的日常生活中的有效性-一项经验抽样研究。

与非临床对照（NC）相比，患有精神病的个体报告采用了更多的适应不良和较少适应的情绪调节（ER）策略。然而，尚不清楚这是否可以预测日常生活中的情感影响，以及是否有精神病患者在日常生活中使用ER策略的频率较低和效率较低。患有精神病和当前妄想（PDs； n = 71）和NCs（n = 42）的人完成了习惯性ER调查表，并连续6天经历了抽样调查，其中他们每天报告10次存在负面和正面影响，部署ER策略（重新评估，接受，意识，压制，沉思，分心和社交共享）。通过检查正面和负面影响的连续差异来实施策略使用的有效性。进行了多级回归分析。习惯性ER的问卷很大程度上预测了日常生活中的影响。有迹象表明，与NCs相比，PD的假定适应不良策略的使用频率更高，但个体适应策略没有差异，甚至PD的使用频率更高（重新评估）。事实证明，几种ER策略（例如重新评估，反省）可以有效地减少下一次提示的负面影响，而与组无关，但抑制仅对PD有效，并且接受对两组均不利。因此，PD在日常生活中显示出越来越多地使用ER策略，其中大多数帮助他们减少了负面影响。这表明，在部署明确的ER策略时遇到困难，无法解释其增加的负面影响。