当前位置: X-MOL 学术Breast Cancer Res. Treat. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Evaluating the clinical effectiveness and safety of various HER2-targeted regimens after prior taxane/trastuzumab in patients with previously treated, unresectable, or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment ( IF 3.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-25 , DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05577-7
Noman Paracha 1 , Adriana Reyes 1 , Véronique Diéras 2 , Ian Krop 3 , Xavier Pivot 4 , Ander Urruticoechea 5
Affiliation  

PURPOSE In the absence of head-to-head trial data, network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to compare trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with other approved treatments for previously treated patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). METHODS Systematic reviews were conducted of published controlled trials of treatments for unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive BC with early relapse (≤ 6 months) following adjuvant therapy or progression after trastuzumab (Tras) + taxane published from January 1998 to January 2018. Random-effects NMA was conducted for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety endpoints. RESULTS The NMA included regimens from seven randomized controlled trials: T-DM1 and combinations of Tras, capecitabine (Cap), lapatinib (Lap), neratinib, or pertuzumab (Per; unapproved). OS results favored T-DM1 over approved comparators: hazard ratio (HR) (95% credible interval [95% CrI]) vs Cap 0.68 (0.39, 1.10), LapCap 0.76 (0.51, 1.07), TrasCap 0.78 (0.44, 1.19). PFS trends favored T-DM1 over all other treatments: HR (95% CrI) vs Cap 0.38 (0.19, 0.74), LapCap 0.65 (0.40, 1.10), TrasCap 0.62 (0.34, 1.18); ORR with T-DM1 was more favorable than with all approved treatments. In surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis T-DM1 ranked highest for all efficacy outcomes. Discontinuation due to adverse events was less likely with T-DM1 than with all comparators except neratinib. In general, gastrointestinal side effects were less likely and elevated liver transaminases and thrombocytopenia more likely with T-DM1 than with comparators. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and tolerability profiles of T-DM1 are generally favorable compared with other treatments for unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive BC.

中文翻译:


评估既往接受过治疗、不可切除或转移性 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者接受紫杉烷/曲妥珠单抗治疗后各种 HER2 靶向治疗方案的临床有效性和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。



目的 在缺乏头对头试验数据的情况下,使用网络荟萃分析 (NMA) 将曲妥珠单抗 emtansine (T-DM1) 与其他批准的治疗方法用于既往接受过治疗的不可切除或转移性 HER2 阳性乳腺癌 (BC) 患者的比较)。方法 对 1998 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月发表的辅助治疗后早期复发(≤ 6 个月)或曲妥珠单抗 (Tras) + 紫杉烷治疗后进展的不可切除或转移性 HER2 阳性 BC 治疗的对照试验进行了系统评价。 随机效应NMA 的目的是评估总生存期 (OS)、无进展生存期 (PFS)、总缓解率 (ORR) 和安全性终点。结果 NMA 包括来自七项随机对照试验的治疗方案:T-DM1 以及 Tras、卡培他滨 (Cap)、拉帕替尼 (Lap)、来拉替尼或帕妥珠单抗(Per;未批准)的组合。与批准的比较器相比,T-DM1 的 OS 结果更有利:风险比 (HR)(95% 可信区间 [95% CrI])对比 Cap 0.68 (0.39, 1.10)、LapCap 0.76 (0.51, 1.07)、TrasCap 0.78 (0.44, 1.19) 。 PFS 趋势优于所有其他治疗:HR (95% CrI) 对比 Cap 0.38 (0.19, 0.74)、LapCap 0.65 (0.40, 1.10)、TrasCap 0.62 (0.34, 1.18); T-DM1 的 ORR 比所有已批准的治疗方法更有利。在累积排名曲线下表面 (SUCRA) 分析中,T-DM1 在所有疗效结果中排名最高。与除来那替尼外的所有比较药物相比,T-DM1 因不良事件而停药的可能性较小。一般来说,与对照组相比,T-DM1 出现胃肠道副作用的可能性较小,并且肝转氨酶升高和血小板减少的可能性更大。 结论 对于不可切除或转移性 HER2 阳性 BC,T-DM1 的疗效和耐受性总体上优于其他治疗方法。
更新日期:2020-02-25
down
wechat
bug