当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Faster, more accurate, stack-flow measurements.
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-21 , DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713249
A N Johnson 1 , I I Shinder 1 , B J Filla 1 , J T Boyd 1 , R Bryant 1 , M R Moldover 1 , T D Martz 2 , M R Gentry 3
Affiliation  

Exhaust flows from coal-fired electricity-generating plants are determined by averaging flue gas velocities measured at prescribed points in the stack cross section. These velocity measurements are made using EPA-approved differential pressure probes such as the 2-hole S-probe or the 5-hole spherical probe. Measurements using the more accurate 5-hole spherical probes require a time-consuming rotation (or nulling) of the probe to find the yaw angle. We developed a time-saving non-nulling technique using a spherical probe that measures all 3 components of velocity and therefore provides better accuracy than an S-probe. We compared the non-nulling technique with the EPA Method 2F nulling technique at both high (16 m/s) and low (7 m/s) loads in a coal-fired powerplant smokestack. Their excellent mutual agreement (within 0.3% of the flow) demonstrates that the non-nulling technique accurately measures flue gas flows.Implications: Accurate flow measurements are critical for quantifying the levels of greenhouse gases emitted from coal-fired power plant smokestacks. Flow measurement accuracy derives from the annual calibration of stack flow monitors. Calibrations are performed using EPA sanctioned pitot traverse methods called the flow relative accuracy test audit (RATA). This study demonstrates the viability of a new pitot traverse method, herein called the Non-Nulling Method. Testing in a coal-fired power plant stack showed that the new method is 5 times faster to implement than the most accurate EPA pitot traverse method (i.e., Method 2F), yet gives the same or better accuracy.

中文翻译:

更快,更准确的烟囱流量测量。

燃煤发电厂的废气流量是通过对烟囱横截面中指定点处测得的烟气速度进行平均来确定的。这些速度测量是使用EPA批准的差压探头(例如2孔S探头或5孔球形探头)进行的。使用更精确的5孔球形探头进行测量需要耗时的旋转(或调零)以找到偏航角。我们开发了一种节省时间的非调零技术,该技术使用球形探针来测量速度的所有三个分量,因此比S探针具有更高的精度。我们将燃煤电厂烟囱中高负荷(16 m / s)和低负荷(7 m / s)下的非清零技术与EPA Method 2F清零技术进行了比较。他们之间的出色共识(0分以内。流量的3%)表明非零排放技术可以准确测量烟气流量。含义:准确的流量测量对于量化燃煤电厂烟囱排放的温室气体的水平至关重要。流量测量精度来自烟囱流量监控器的年度校准。使用称为“流量相对精度测试审核(RATA)”的EPA认可的皮托管遍历方法执行校准。这项研究证明了一种新的皮托管遍历方法的可行性,此方法在本文中称为“非调零法”。在燃煤电厂烟囱中进行的测试表明,该新方法的实施速度是最精确的EPA皮托管遍历方法(即方法2F)的5倍,但准确度相同或更高。准确的流量测量对于量化燃煤电厂烟囱排放的温室气体的水平至关重要。流量测量精度来自烟囱流量监控器的年度校准。使用称为“流量相对精度测试审核(RATA)”的EPA认可的皮托管遍历方法执行校准。这项研究证明了一种新的皮托管遍历方法的可行性,此方法在本文中称为“非调零法”。在燃煤电厂烟囱中进行的测试表明,该新方法的实施速度是最精确的EPA皮托管遍历方法(即方法2F)的5倍,但准确度相同或更高。准确的流量测量对于量化燃煤电厂烟囱排放的温室气体的水平至关重要。流量测量精度来自烟囱流量监控器的年度校准。使用称为流相对精度测试审核(RATA)的EPA认可的皮托管遍历方法执行校准。这项研究证明了一种新的皮托管遍历方法的可行性,本文将其称为“非调零法”。在燃煤电厂烟囱中进行的测试表明,该新方法的实施速度是最精确的EPA皮托管遍历方法(即方法2F)的5倍,但准确度相同或更高。流量测量精度来自烟囱流量监控器的年度校准。使用称为流相对精度测试审核(RATA)的EPA认可的皮托管遍历方法执行校准。这项研究证明了一种新的皮托管遍历方法的可行性,本文将其称为“非调零法”。在燃煤电厂烟囱中进行的测试表明,该新方法的实施速度是最精确的EPA皮托管遍历方法(即方法2F)的5倍,但准确度相同或更高。流量测量精度来自烟囱流量监控器的年度校准。使用称为流相对精度测试审核(RATA)的EPA认可的皮托管遍历方法执行校准。这项研究证明了一种新的皮托管遍历方法的可行性,本文将其称为“非调零法”。在燃煤电厂烟囱中进行的测试表明,该新方法的实施速度是最精确的EPA皮托管遍历方法(即方法2F)的5倍,但准确度相同或更高。
更新日期:2020-01-21
down
wechat
bug