An increasing number of studies are applying multilevel modeling (MLM) to daily diary assessments of emotional and cognitive reactivity (ER and CR). Despite their generation of promising results, these methods have yet to be validated. The current study, consisting of 449 participants from over 90 different colleges and universities, had 2 goals: (a) to assess the convergent validity of these methods in relation to more conventional measures, and (b) to assess the construct validity of these methods in relation to depressive symptoms. Results support the extraction of within- versus between-person aspects of both constructs from daily diary data. Evidence of convergent validity derives from the association of MLM-based estimates of ER and CR with established self-report questionnaire methods. Evidence of construct validity derives from the relation of these estimates to symptoms of depression. The value of distinguishing within- from between-person aspects of ER and CR is discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

情绪和认知反应性：验证每日日记数据的多层次建模方法。

越来越多的研究将多层模型（MLM）应用于情绪和认知反应性（ER和CR）的每日日记评估。尽管产生了可喜的结果，但这些方法尚未得到验证。当前的研究由来自90多个不同学院和大学的449名参与者组成，其目标是2个：（a）评估这些方法相对于常规方法的收敛有效性，以及（b）评估这些方法的构造有效性与抑郁症状有关。结果支持从每日日记数据中提取两种构造的人际关系和人际关系。收敛效度的证据来自基于MLM的ER和CR估计与已建立的自我报告调查表方法的关联。建构效度的证据来自这些估计与抑郁症状之间的关系。讨论了区分ER和CR人际关系方面的价值。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。