The author discusses rights-based arguments for and against cochlear implants in congenitally deaf children and analyzes whether CIs should be required by law or left to parental discretion. Positions for and against CIs are analyzed in light of two rights-based arguments: Griffin's theory on personhood as a solution to a conflict of rights and his theory on quality of life as a solution to a conflict between rights and welfare (Griffin, 2008). The question of whether CIs should be required by law is then discussed in light of Nickel's theories on the justification of specific rights and on the avoidance of conflicts (Nickel, 2007). In this discussion, the author's aim is not to propose definitive answers, but to apply philosophical theories to the debate and introduce tools for analyzing arguments for and against CIs in children and for regulating cochlear implantation.

中文翻译：

---

先天性聋儿童的人工耳蜗：基于权利论证的讨论。

作者讨论了针对先天性聋儿耳蜗植入的反对和反对基于权利的论据，并分析了法律是否应要求CI或由父母自行决定是否使用CI。根据两种基于权利的论点分析了支持和反对CI的立场：格里芬关于解决冲突冲突的人格理论和生活质量作为解决权利与福利冲突的理论（格里芬，2008年） 。然后，根据尼克关于特定权利的合理性和避免冲突的理论，讨论了是否应根据法律要求使用配置项的问题（Nickel，2007年）。在此讨论中，作者的目的不是提出明确的答案，